The local authorityCouncil · Unitary · England · 1 of 63 unitary authorities

Portsmouth.

Liberal Democrats-controlled unitary. £232m net revenue. 14 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

TypeUnitary
Seats15 councillors · 14 wards
Last election7 May 2026
Websiteportsmouth.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£232m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,181
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
8/15
Liberal Democrats 53%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Liberal Democrats chamber, opposed area.

Portsmouth is a unitary controlled by Liberal Democrats (8 of 15 seats). Net revenue is £232m for 2025-26. It covers 14 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.15 seats · last contested 7 May 2026

Who sits in the chamber.

LD 8Ref 5Con 1Portsmouth Independent Party 1

Liberal Democrats 53% · last contested 7 May 2026

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Abdul KadirLDBaffins2026
Kate DorringtonLDCentral Southsea2026
Sam CouplandRefCharles Dickens2026
Carl InmanRefCopnor2026
Lamara Louise FudgeRefCosham2026
Derek James NorthIndCosham2024
Simon John BosherConDrayton Farlington2026
Matthew Ray WinningtonLDEastney Craneswater2026
Billy AnsellLDFratton2026
Russell Peter William SimpsonRefHilsea2026
Steve PittLDMilton2026
Steve AndrewsLDNelson2026
Showing 12 of 15·All 15 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

46%
Council tax
£106.2m · median 59%
39%
Central grants
£91.4m · median 30%
15%
Business rates
£34.1m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy unitary authoritie: 46% from council tax vs the cohort median of 59%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,818
County / upper-tier£0
Police£275
Fire & rescue£88
GLA precept£0
Total Band-D£2,181

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 62 other unitary authorities

How does Portsmouth split its revenue across services, compared with peer unitary authoritie-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education29.4% of net spend · cohort median 36%
47 of 61-18% vs median
Adult Social Care23.6% of net spend · cohort median 27%
55 of 61-13% vs median
Children's Services16.8% of net spend · cohort median 15%
23 of 61+14% vs median
Housing & Homelessness5.8% of net spend · cohort median 2%
1 of 61+201% vs median
Public Health5.8% of net spend · cohort median 4%
7 of 61+57% vs median
Waste & Recycling5.1% of net spend · cohort median 6%
43 of 61-10% vs median
Culture & Leisure4.9% of net spend · cohort median 2%
1 of 61+125% vs median
Highways & Transport4.5% of net spend · cohort median 3%
7 of 61+73% vs median
Planning & Economic Development2.3% of net spend · cohort median 1%
11 of 61+65% vs median
Corporate & Central1.9% of net spend · cohort median 3%
50 of 61-35% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.48,959 payments · £206.7m gross · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
VSBW JOINT VENTURE£16.34m7.9%16
ENSIGN HIGHWAYS LIMITED£11.71m5.7%4
MOUNTJOY LIMITED£8.45m4.1%26
COMSERV (UK) LIMITED£6.92m3.3%4
SOUTHAMPTON CITY COUNCIL£6.35m3.1%19
HAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£6.09m2.9%393
M GROUP ENERGY (AGILITY ECO SERVICES LIMITED£5.72m2.8%29
POLICE AND CRIME COMMISSIONER FOR HAMPSHIRE£5.57m2.7%8
SOLENT ACADEMIES TRUST£5.23m2.5%59
CLASSIFIED AS 'PERSONAL DATA' (UNDER THE DATA PROTECTION ACT 2018)£3.53m1.7%11,382

By service area · top supplier

ServiceTop supplierPaid
Corporate And CentralVSBW JOINT VENTURE£11.03m
Highways And TransportENSIGN HIGHWAYS LIMITED£8.78m
Housing And HomelessnessMOUNTJOY LIMITED£5.34m
Childrens ServicesSOLENT ACADEMIES TRUST£3.90m
Adult Social CareMILLBROOK HEALTHCARE GROUP LIMITED£0.95m
Waste And RecyclingHAMPSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.89m
Culture And LeisureBRYT ENERGY LTD£0.17m
§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.14 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Portsmouth North750% Amanda MartinLab
Portsmouth South750% Stephen MorganLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 62 other unitary authorities
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
48,959 payments · 3 Dec 202531 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level