The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Lancaster.

Labour Party-controlled district. £20m net revenue. 27 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats65 councillors · 27 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£20m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,408
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
25/65
Labour Party 38%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Labour Party chamber, Labour Party MPs.

Lancaster is a district controlled by Labour Party (25 of 65 seats). Net revenue is £20m for 2025-26. It covers 27 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.65 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 25Green 22LD 7Con 5Morecambe Bay Independents 5Independent Berwick Hills Resident 1

Labour Party 38% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
David Martin BottomsIndBare2023
Gerry BlaikieLDBare2023
Kate Sarah KnightConBare2023
John WildConBolton Slyne2023
Keith BuddenConBolton Slyne2023
Paul Morris NewtonConBolton Slyne2023
Hamish MillsGrnBowerham2023
Sarah PunshonGrnBowerham2023
Caroline JacksonGrnBulk2023
Jack LenoxGrnBulk2023
Sam RichesGrnBulk2023
Chris HannaLabCarnforth Millhead2023
Showing 12 of 65·All 65 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

56%
Council tax
£11.3m · median 61%
28%
Central grants
£5.6m · median 26%
17%
Business rates
£3.4m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy councils (district): 56% from council tax vs the cohort median of 61%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£264
County / upper-tier£1,736
Police£277
Fire & rescue£90
GLA precept£0
Parish average£40
Total Band-D£2,408

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.7 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Lancaster split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling28.4% of net spend · cohort median 32%
107 of 158-11% vs median
Corporate & Central25.5% of net spend · cohort median 27%
88 of 158-5% vs median
Planning & Economic Development21.7% of net spend · cohort median 14%
24 of 158+50% vs median
Culture & Leisure17.4% of net spend · cohort median 13%
39 of 158+30% vs median
Housing & Homelessness15.3% of net spend · cohort median 14%
64 of 158+9% vs median
Children's Services0.1% of net spend · cohort median 1%
9 of 9-94% vs median
Highways & Transport-8.4% of net spend · cohort median -2%
123 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.3,155 payments · £25.8m gross · 3 Dec 20251 Apr 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
DENNIS EAGLE LTD£3.31m12.8%16
EDEN PROJECT MORECAMBE LIMITED£2.22m8.6%4
ALT-SOLAR LIMITED£1.70m6.6%17
IPL PLASTICS UK LIMITED£1.30m5.1%68
MORECAMBE TOWN COUNCIL£1.05m4.1%1
TERBERG MATEC UK LTD£0.97m3.8%9
PRESTON CITY COUNCIL£0.77m3.0%24
ALTERNATIVE HEAT LTD£0.75m2.9%3
GLASDON U.K. LTD£0.49m1.9%29
EMCOR GROUP (UK) LTD£0.49m1.9%9

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.27 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Morecambe and Lunesdale1763% Lizzi CollingeLab
Lancaster and Wyre1037% Cat SmithLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
3,155 payments · 3 Dec 20251 Apr 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level