The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Huntingdonshire.

Liberal Democrats-controlled district. £20m net revenue. 26 wards across 3 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats52 councillors · 26 wards
Last election7 May 2026
Net revenue · 2025-26
£20m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,440
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
20/52
Liberal Democrats 38%
Westminster
3
constituencies overlap · 3 MP parties
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Liberal Democrats chamber, 3-party MP geography.

Huntingdonshire is a district controlled by Liberal Democrats (20 of 52 seats). Net revenue is £20m for 2025-26. It covers 26 wards spanning 3 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 3 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.52 seats · last contested 7 May 2026

Who sits in the chamber.

LD 20Con 15Ref 10Ind 4Green 2Lab 1

Liberal Democrats 38% · last contested 7 May 2026

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Ian Derek GardenerConAlconbury2026
Liam Paul Dewey-BeckettLDBrampton2026
Warren SmithLDBrampton2026
Martin Andrew HassallIndBuckden2026
Nick SarkiesLDFenstanton2026
Brett Alistair MickelburghLDGodmanchester Hemingford Abbots2026
Debbie MickelburghLDGodmanchester Hemingford Abbots2026
Sarah Joanne ConboyLDGodmanchester Hemingford Abbots2026
Stephen ClaffeyLDGreat Paxton2026
Stephen CawleyConGreat Staughton2026
David Norman KeaneConHemingford Grey Houghton2026
Paul Andrew Raymond SimpsonConHemingford Grey Houghton2026
Showing 12 of 52·All 52 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

56%
Council tax
£11.1m · median 61%
31%
Central grants
£6.0m · median 26%
13%
Business rates
£2.6m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 56% council tax, 31% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£166
County / upper-tier£1,701
Police£299
Fire & rescue£87
GLA precept£36
Parish average£151
Total Band-D£2,440

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Huntingdonshire split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling37.1% of net spend · cohort median 32%
44 of 158+16% vs median
Corporate & Central22.8% of net spend · cohort median 27%
103 of 158-15% vs median
Culture & Leisure19.5% of net spend · cohort median 13%
31 of 158+45% vs median
Housing & Homelessness13.8% of net spend · cohort median 14%
83 of 158-2% vs median
Planning & Economic Development7.7% of net spend · cohort median 14%
133 of 158-46% vs median
Highways & Transport-0.8% of net spend · cohort median -2%
53 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.2,667 payments · £11.0m gross · 3 Dec 202520 Dec 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
ALLIANCE LEISURE SERVICES LTD£0.74m6.7%5
CCLA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LTD£0.55m5.0%1
BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LTD£0.46m4.2%8
IPL PLASTICS (UK) LTD T/A IPL ROTHERHAM£0.45m4.0%24
SEH FRENCH LTD£0.45m4.0%4
TOTAL GAS AND POWER LTD£0.39m3.5%137
MIRAMAR ENGINEERING LTD£0.36m3.3%64
SAFFRON VANTAGE LTD£0.29m2.6%143
NEW ERA FUELS LTD£0.28m2.6%7
VP-AV LTD£0.20m1.8%7

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.26 wards split across 3 parliamentary seats

Huntingdonshire’s territory crosses 3 Westminster constituencies, with 3 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Huntingdon1765% Ben Obese-JectyCon
St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire623% Ian SollomLD
North West Cambridgeshire312% Sam CarlingLab
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 1 Ind, 1 Ind and 1 Ind MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Liberal Democrats-controlled district — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
2,667 payments · 3 Dec 202520 Dec 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level