The local authorityCouncil · london_borough · England · 1 of 33 councils (london_borough)

Haringey.

Green Party of England and Wales-controlled london_borough. £334m net revenue. 21 wards across 4 parliamentary constituencies.

Typelondon_borough
Seats61 councillors · 21 wards
Last election7 May 2026
Websiteharingey.gov.uk
Net revenue · 2025-26
£334m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,208
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
28/61
Green Party of England and Wales 46%
Westminster
4
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
29 Jun 2026

Green Party of England and Wales chamber, opposed area.

Haringey is a london_borough controlled by Green Party of England and Wales (28 of 61 seats). Net revenue is £334m for 2025-26. It covers 21 wards spanning 4 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.61 seats · last contested 7 May 2026

Who sits in the chamber.

Green 28Lab 24LD 9

Green Party of England and Wales 46% · last contested 7 May 2026

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
AJ EgemonyeLabAlexandra Park2026
Melanie GingellLabAlexandra Park2026
Andrea HodgsonLabBounds Green2026
Emily ArkellLabBounds Green2026
Emily Kate ArkellLabBounds Green2022
Dan JohnsonGrnBruce Castle2026
Ibrahim AliLabBruce Castle2026
Sue JamesonLabBruce Castle2026
Fiona Orford-WilliamsLDCrouch End2026
Imad AhmedLDCrouch End2026
Luke Cawley-HarrisonLDCrouch End2026
Daniela ParryLabFortis Green2026
Showing 12 of 61·All 61 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

43%
Council tax
£142.1m · median 47%
40%
Central grants
£133.7m · median 38%
18%
Business rates
£58.5m · median 16%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (london_borough) median: 43% council tax, 40% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£1,718
County / upper-tier£490
Police£0
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£0
Total Band-D£2,208

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.10 buckets · vs 32 other councils (london_borough)

How does Haringey split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (london_borough)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Education45.4% of net spend · cohort median 42%
12 of 33+9% vs median
Adult Social Care24.1% of net spend · cohort median 22%
12 of 33+12% vs median
Children's Services13.1% of net spend · cohort median 13%
16 of 330% vs median
Housing & Homelessness6.8% of net spend · cohort median 6%
14 of 33+20% vs median
Public Health4.2% of net spend · cohort median 3%
12 of 33+20% vs median
Waste & Recycling3.7% of net spend · cohort median 4%
20 of 33-12% vs median
Culture & Leisure1.9% of net spend · cohort median 2%
15 of 33+6% vs median
Corporate & Central1.7% of net spend · cohort median 3%
28 of 33-50% vs median
Planning & Economic Development1.0% of net spend · cohort median 1%
18 of 33-1% vs median
Highways & Transport-1.8% of net spend · cohort median 1%
27 of 33-380% vs median
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.21 wards split across 4 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Tottenham943% David LammyLab
Hornsey and Friern Barnet733% Catherine WestLab
Southgate and Wood Green419% Bambos CharalambousLab
Hampstead and Highgate15% Tulip SiddiqLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 32 other councils (london_borough)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
Not yet ingested for Haringey
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level