The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Gravesham.

Labour Party-controlled district. £14m net revenue. 17 wards across 1 parliamentary constituency.

Typedistrict
Seats43 councillors · 17 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£14m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,313
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
24/43
Labour Party 56%
Westminster
1
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Labour Party chamber, Labour Party MPs.

Gravesham is a district controlled by Labour Party (24 of 43 seats). Net revenue is £14m for 2025-26. It covers 17 wards spanning 1 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.43 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 24Con 19

Labour Party 56% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Leslie HillsConChalk2023
Christina Marie RollesLabColdharbour Perry Street2023
Narinderjit Singh ThandiLabColdharbour Perry Street2023
Shane Trevor Mochrie-CoxLabColdharbour Perry Street2023
Deborah CroxtonLabDenton2023
Lee Kevin CroxtonLabDenton2023
Helen AshendenConHigham Shorne2023
Jordan MeadeConHigham Shorne2023
Leslie Mark PeartonConHigham Shorne2023
Dakota DibbenConIstead Rise Cobham Luddesdown2023
Samir JassalConIstead Rise Cobham Luddesdown2023
Frank WardleConMeopham North2023
Showing 12 of 43·All 43 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

64%
Council tax
£8.7m · median 61%
24%
Central grants
£3.2m · median 26%
13%
Business rates
£1.7m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 64% council tax, 24% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£238
County / upper-tier£1,691
Police£270
Fire & rescue£95
GLA precept£0
Parish average£19
Total Band-D£2,313

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.7 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Gravesham split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Corporate & Central35.5% of net spend · cohort median 27%
39 of 158+32% vs median
Waste & Recycling33.6% of net spend · cohort median 32%
62 of 158+5% vs median
Housing & Homelessness17.4% of net spend · cohort median 14%
44 of 158+24% vs median
Culture & Leisure9.1% of net spend · cohort median 13%
109 of 158-32% vs median
Planning & Economic Development7.7% of net spend · cohort median 14%
134 of 158-46% vs median
Public Health0.4% of net spend · cohort median 0%
19 of 38+2% vs median
Highways & Transport-3.8% of net spend · cohort median -2%
93 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.4,025 payments · £44.6m gross · 5 Dec 202524 Apr 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
NORTHERN IRELAND HOUSING EXECUTIVE£10.47m23.5%4
OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£7.83m17.6%2
ROSHERVILLE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LTD£5.42m12.2%10
GRAVESHAM COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP LLP£1.63m3.7%1
WILLMOTT DIXON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED£1.19m2.7%5
CARBON 3 LTD£0.88m2.0%17
OAKWOOD BUILDING CONTRACTORS LTD£0.83m1.9%3
HUWS GRAY LTD£0.64m1.4%90
A & E ELKINS LTD£0.60m1.3%4
NINA CONSTRUCTION LIMITED£0.56m1.3%182

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.17 wards split across 1 parliamentary seat
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Gravesham17100% Lauren SullivanLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
4,025 payments · 5 Dec 202524 Apr 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level