The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Forest of Dean.

Green Party of England and Wales-controlled district. £11m net revenue. 21 wards across 1 parliamentary constituency.

Typedistrict
Seats40 councillors · 21 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£11m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,327
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
16/40
Green Party of England and Wales 40%
Westminster
1
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Green Party of England and Wales chamber, opposed area.

Forest of Dean is a district controlled by Green Party of England and Wales (16 of 40 seats). Net revenue is £11m for 2025-26. It covers 21 wards spanning 1 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.40 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Green 16Independent Berwick Hills Resident 12Lab 5Con 4LD 3

Green Party of England and Wales 40% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Jamie ElsmoreIndBerry Hill2023
Tim GwilliamIndBerry Hill2023
Alison Jennifer BruceGrnBream2023
Beth LlewellynGrnBream2023
Di MartinLabCinderford East2023
Matt BishopLabCinderford East2023
Jacob Edward SandersLabCinderford West2023
Mark David TurnerIndCinderford West2023
Mark David TurnerIndCinderford West2019
Clive Terence ElsmoreIndColeford2023
Ian WhitburnIndColeford2023
Patrick Joseph KyneLabColeford2023
Showing 12 of 40·All 40 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

60%
Council tax
£6.7m · median 61%
27%
Central grants
£3.1m · median 26%
13%
Business rates
£1.5m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 60% council tax, 27% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£212
County / upper-tier£1,680
Police£322
Fire & rescue£0
GLA precept£0
Parish average£113
Total Band-D£2,327

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Forest of Dean split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling33.6% of net spend · cohort median 32%
64 of 158+5% vs median
Corporate & Central32.1% of net spend · cohort median 27%
49 of 158+20% vs median
Planning & Economic Development21.3% of net spend · cohort median 14%
28 of 158+47% vs median
Housing & Homelessness9.8% of net spend · cohort median 14%
121 of 158-30% vs median
Culture & Leisure3.0% of net spend · cohort median 13%
144 of 158-78% vs median
Highways & Transport0.3% of net spend · cohort median -2%
41 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.403 payments · £0.8m gross · 4 Jan 20264 Sept 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
TWO RIVERS HOUSING (DF GRANTS & GENERAL)£0.09m11.5%1
LOOKERS LTD (FORD)£0.08m9.9%4
TALUS CONSTRUCTION LTD£0.06m7.7%1
SOUTH WEST AUDIT PARTNERSHIP LIMITED (SWAP)£0.03m3.9%1
IPL PLASTICS (UK) LTD T/A IPL HULL£0.03m3.8%2
CLEAN SLATE TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT CIC£0.03m3.3%1
ATMOS SECURITY£0.02m3.1%37
OBJECTIVE CORPORATION UK LTD£0.02m3.0%2
S P TECH PROPERTY SERVICES£0.02m2.9%2
WILLMOTT DIXON CONSTRUCTION LIMITED£0.02m2.8%1

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.21 wards split across 1 parliamentary seat
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Forest of Dean21100% Matt BishopLab
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
403 payments · 4 Jan 20264 Sept 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level