The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Dartford.

Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district. £16m net revenue. 20 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats47 councillors · 20 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£16m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,281
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
31/47
Conservative and Unionist Party 66%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 2 MP parties
Dispatch
31 May 2026

Conservative and Unionist Party chamber, 2-party MP geography.

Dartford is a district controlled by Conservative and Unionist Party (31 of 47 seats). Net revenue is £16m for 2025-26. It covers 20 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies. The MP geography crosses 2 parties — a heterogeneous setup.

§ 01Composition.47 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Con 31Lab 14Green 1Swanscombe and Greenhithe Residents Association 1

Conservative and Unionist Party 66% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
David HammockConBean Village Park2023
Peter WhapshottConBrent2023
Rosanna Marina CurransConBrent2023
Rosanna Marina CurransConBrent2019
Clement QuaqumeyConBridge2023
Matthew John DavisConBurnham2023
Paul Michael DenmanConDarenth2023
Danny NicklenConEbbsfleet2023
Jonathon Simon HawkesLabEbbsfleet2023
Victoria Akintomide-AkinwamideLabEbbsfleet2023
Carol Mary GaleConGreenhithe Knockhall2023
David MoteConGreenhithe Knockhall2023
Showing 12 of 47·All 47 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

49%
Council tax
£7.9m · median 61%
41%
Central grants
£6.6m · median 26%
10%
Business rates
£1.6m · median 11%

This is a grant-heavy councils (district): 49% from council tax vs the cohort median of 61%.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£189
County / upper-tier£1,691
Police£270
Fire & rescue£95
GLA precept£0
Parish average£36
Total Band-D£2,281

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.7 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Dartford split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling33.2% of net spend · cohort median 32%
70 of 158+4% vs median
Housing & Homelessness25.4% of net spend · cohort median 14%
15 of 158+81% vs median
Corporate & Central17.9% of net spend · cohort median 27%
128 of 158-33% vs median
Planning & Economic Development14.5% of net spend · cohort median 14%
79 of 1580% vs median
Culture & Leisure8.9% of net spend · cohort median 13%
111 of 158-34% vs median
Public Health0.2% of net spend · cohort median 0%
27 of 38-55% vs median
Highways & Transport0.0% of net spend · cohort median -2%
44 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.1,754 payments · £23.1m gross · 5 Dec 20253 Jun 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
CLIFFORD DEVLIN LIMITED£5.51m23.8%6
FCC RECYCLING (UK) LIMITED£2.04m8.8%74
TSG BUILDING SERVICES PLC£1.93m8.3%85
KCC RE KENT PENSION FUND£1.21m5.2%9
INLAND REVENUE£1.10m4.7%9
SAFE HOMES SE£0.81m3.5%16
TROWERS & HAMLINS£0.72m3.1%1
HENDERSON & TAYLOR PUBLIC WORKS LTD£0.72m3.1%4
T G BAYNES CLIENT ACCOUNT£0.70m3.0%8
PARAMOUNT INDEPENDENT PROPERTY SERVICES£0.59m2.5%12

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.20 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats

Dartford’s territory crosses 2 Westminster constituencies, with 2 MP parties represented. The middle column shows how much of the council each seat carries.

ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Dartford1995% Jim DicksonLab
Sevenoaks15% Laura TrottCon
Of note · the mixed-MP geography

This council holds 1 Ind and 1 Ind MPs. That’s an unusually heterogeneous geography for a Conservative and Unionist Party-controlled district — most weeks one MP is asking the council for something and another is praising it.

Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
1,754 payments · 5 Dec 20253 Jun 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level