The local authorityCouncil · district · England · 1 of 164 councils (district)

Broxtowe.

Labour Party-controlled district. £11m net revenue. 20 wards across 2 parliamentary constituencies.

Typedistrict
Seats44 councillors · 20 wards
Last election4 May 2023
Net revenue · 2025-26
£11m
Core spending power (MHCLG)
Band-D bill
£2,516
For the council slice (incl. precepts)
Composition
26/44
Labour Party 59%
Westminster
2
constituencies overlap · 1 MP party
Dispatch
29 Jun 2026

Labour Party chamber, Labour Party MPs.

Broxtowe is a district controlled by Labour Party (26 of 44 seats). Net revenue is £11m for 2025-26. It covers 20 wards spanning 2 parliamentary constituencies.

§ 01Composition.44 seats · last contested 4 May 2023

Who sits in the chamber.

Lab 26Con 10LD 5Ind 3

Labour Party 59% · last contested 4 May 2023

Councillors — the people.

CouncillorWardElected
Helen Jane FaccioLabAttenborough & Chilwell East2023
Pauline Ann SmithLabAttenborough & Chilwell East2023
Richard Stephen FalveyLabAttenborough & Chilwell East2023
Don PringleConAwsworth, Cossall & Trowell2023
Lydia Antoinette BallConAwsworth, Cossall & Trowell2023
Gabrielle BunnLabBeeston Central2023
Vanessa Claire SmithLabBeeston Central2023
Barbara CarrLDBeeston North2023
Steve CarrLDBeeston North2023
Sarah WebbLabBeeston Rylands2023
Shaun DannheimerLabBeeston Rylands2023
Ellie WinfieldLabBeeston West2023
Showing 12 of 44·All 44 councillors
§ 02Revenue mix & Band-D bill.MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table

Where revenue comes from.

60%
Council tax
£6.9m · median 61%
25%
Central grants
£2.9m · median 26%
15%
Business rates
£1.7m · median 11%

Revenue mix is close to the councils (district) median: 60% council tax, 25% central grants.

Source · MHCLG — Final LGFS 2025-26 Core Spending Power table · derived (CT exact; grants/rates split from SFA baseline)

Band-D bill.

Council slice£194
County / upper-tier£1,895
Police£296
Fire & rescue£97
GLA precept£0
Parish average£35
Total Band-D£2,516

Parish precepts apply on top, vary by parish

For household tax breakdown

Use the income slider on My place to see income tax, NI, VAT and council tax against your earnings.

§ 03Service spend, ranked against peers.6 buckets · vs 163 other councils (district)

How does Broxtowe split its revenue across services, compared with peer councils (district)-class councils? Each row is one of the ten standard service buckets. The vertical line at the centre is the cohort median share; the coloured square is where this council sits. Squares to the right of centre mean a bigger share of revenue than the median peer; to the left, a smaller share.

Waste & Recycling26.9% of net spend · cohort median 32%
116 of 158-16% vs median
Corporate & Central23.5% of net spend · cohort median 27%
99 of 158-12% vs median
Planning & Economic Development22.8% of net spend · cohort median 14%
21 of 158+58% vs median
Culture & Leisure16.3% of net spend · cohort median 13%
49 of 158+22% vs median
Housing & Homelessness10.0% of net spend · cohort median 14%
119 of 158-29% vs median
Highways & Transport0.5% of net spend · cohort median -2%
34 of 158
How to read these bars

The subtitle on each row (“X% of net spend”) is what share of this council’s revenue goes to that service. The rank (“15 of 61”) is where this council sits within the cohort, sorted by that share descending. The delta (“+26% vs median”) is a relative reading: the council allocates 26% more of its revenue to that service than the median peer would. A small absolute difference can still be a big relative one.

Higher share doesn’t mean waste — it can reflect demographic need (more older residents), rurality, or a policy choice (e.g. keeping a service in-house). Lower share doesn’t mean efficiency — some councils move costs to fees, ringfenced accounts, or grants. £-per-head would be sharper than share-of-revenue; LAD population is pending ingest. Comparisons are within the same council type only.

§ 04Top suppliers.6,133 payments · £15.5m gross · 5 Dec 202530 Mar 2026

Every invoice over £500, published under the Local Government Transparency Code. Best-effort, not statutory — counts and totals net negatives (refunds/reversals).

Top by total — last 180 days

SupplierPaidSharePmts
GEDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD£1.50m9.7%7
PETER JAMES HOMES LTD£1.21m7.8%5
HARWORTH ESTATES INVESTMENTS LIMITED£1.13m7.3%4
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL£0.69m4.5%17
FACULTATIEVE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED£0.66m4.3%25
JRD DESIGN & BUILD LTD£0.58m3.7%5
HLS MCCONNELL LIMITED£0.54m3.5%10
MATTHEWS & TANNERT LIMITED£0.50m3.2%26
UI SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED£0.46m2.9%14
NOTTINGHAM DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED£0.44m2.9%5

By service area · top supplier

Service-classified supplier data not yet ingested for this council.

§ 05Westminster constituencies — the overlap.20 wards split across 2 parliamentary seats
ConstituencyWards% of councilCurrent MP
Broxtowe1680% Juliet CampbellLab
Nottingham North and Kimberley420% Alex NorrisInd
Sources, methods & last update
Method The dispatch paragraphs are AI-generated from the public sources listed below. Every figure links to its source. If we’re wrong, please tell us — corrections within 48 hours.
CompositionDemocracy Club (live)
DCLEAPIL v1.0 (historic)
Net revenueMHCLG Final LGFS
Core Spending Power table · 2025-26
Service spendDerived from MHCLG CSP shares
vs 163 other councils (district)
Band-DMHCLG CSP · precept schedules
Police, Fire, Parish on top
SuppliersCouncil publication under LGTC
6,133 payments · 5 Dec 202530 Mar 2026
Westminster overlapONS Open Geography Portal
2023 boundaries
PopulationONS mid-year estimates
Pending ingest at LAD level