Committee publication · Report · 23 April 2026 · HC 852

9th Report - Addressing the risks from Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)

From: Environmental Audit Committee

Inquiry: Addressing the risks from Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)

Government response deadline: 23 June 2026

Summary

The Environmental Audit Committee's 9th Report (April 2026) examines UK government action on PFAS—persistent 'forever chemicals' found in thousands of everyday products and now present in human blood and the environment. The committee concludes the Government's February 2026 PFAS Plan lacks decisive action to prevent ongoing emissions. The UK's chemicals regulatory framework (UK REACH) lags the EU, creating competitive risks and higher pollution. The report calls for immediate restrictions on non-essential PFAS uses, reformed regulation, contamination cleanup, and investment in remediation technologies.

Key findings

  • PFAS are present in nearly everyone's blood and across UK rivers, soil, and wildlife, with scientific evidence linking them to cancers, immune suppression, fertility and development problems.
  • UK REACH is too slow to restrict PFAS; the EU added 47 substances to regulatory lists since 2021 while the UK added zero, creating regulatory divergence that disadvantages UK manufacturers and increases public exposure.
  • The Government's PFAS Plan relies heavily on voluntary industry initiatives and monitoring rather than preventative restrictions, conflicting with the environmental principles the Government committed to apply.
  • Non-essential PFAS uses in food packaging, clothing, and cosmetics should be restricted from 2027; essential uses require group-based regulation to prevent harmful chemical substitutes.
  • UK needs clarity, investment, and approved methods for PFAS remediation and destruction, including assessment of incineration capacity and non-incineration alternatives.

Recommendations

  • Government must act in line with environmental principles, applying preventative and precautionary action to reduce cumulative PFAS exposure; explain in its response how due regard to the precautionary principle informed its PFAS approach.
  • Use existing EU-UK dialogue mechanisms to align UK REACH with EU REACH where possible, avoiding regulatory divergence that disadvantages UK manufacturers and increases public exposure.
  • Reform UK REACH by March 2027 to accelerate PFAS restrictions; set targets at half statutory maximum timescales and resource the Health and Safety Executive to meet accelerated timelines.
  • Introduce restrictions on PFAS in non-essential applications (food packaging, clothing, cosmetics) from 2027; where exemptions are granted for essential uses, shift from substance-by-substance to group-based regulation to prevent replacement with structurally similar harmful alternatives.
  • Invest long-term in research, biomonitoring, and enhanced screening for high-exposure groups; introduce statutory limits on PFAS in food and agricultural pathways.
  • Hold polluters accountable for PFAS release into the environment; ensure they pay for cleanup and are effectively deterred from future emissions.
  • Publish approved PFAS remediation and destruction methods; invest in scalable non-incineration technologies; assess whether current incineration capacity is sufficient for rising PFAS waste volumes.

Tone

Critical

Topics

chemicals-regulationenvironmental-protectionpublic-healthpollution-remediationtrade-and-regulatory-alignment

Key actors

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Environmental Audit Committee, Emma Hardy MP (DEFRA Minister for Water and Flooding), Professor Martyn Kirk (Australian National University), Professor Elsie Sunderland (Harvard University), Professor Michael Depledge (European Centre for Environment and Human Health), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

Notable line

… the UK continues to allow highly persistent chemicals to be put into the environment before fully assessing "whether they are dangerous".

Key Quotes

… the UK continues to allow highly persistent chemicals to be put into the environment before fully assessing "whether they are dangerous".
Professor Michael Depledge · Characterizing regulatory failure on PFAS
… the big travesty here is the environmental persistence and the fact that many of them do bioaccumulate and they last in the human body for many years
Professor Martyn Kirk · On why PFAS pose serious risks
… taking action would not even be considered "a particularly precautionary approach right now" because the evidence is "sufficient for regulation".
Professor Elsie Sunderland · On the scientific case for immediate PFAS restriction
… even if you shut the door completely today, we have enough in the environment to keep us going for a very long time
Duncan Sanders, ATG Group · On the legacy PFAS contamination already released
PFAS can build up in the environment to reach harmful levels. The use and regulation of PFAS are a matter of health and environmental concern in the UK and beyond
Dame Glenys Stacey, former Office for Environmental Protection Chair · On PFAS persistence and regulatory importance
… we need to change the system [so] we can quickly catch up with the European Union
Emma Hardy MP · On need to reform UK REACH process
… focussing on monitoring alone, without corresponding measures to prevent emissions at source, will not meaningfully reduce PFAS in the environment
Fidra (environmental charity) · Criticizing reliance on monitoring without prevention
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗