Committee publication · Correspondence · 25 February 2026

Correspondence with Ofcom relating to disinformation, dated 17 February and 03 February 2026

From: Foreign Affairs Committee

Inquiry: Disinformation diplomacy: How malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy

Summary

Ofcom responds to Foreign Affairs Committee concerns about foreign information manipulation and interference targeting the UK. Dame Melanie Dawes outlines existing provisions under the Online Safety Act requiring platforms to assess foreign interference risks, remove illegal content, train moderation teams, and resource appropriately. Ofcom acknowledges enforcement challenges due to the Foreign Interference Offence's high threshold, but commits to strengthening codes of practice later in 2026 and emphasises the need for coordinated response across government, intelligence services, and regulators.

Key findings

  • Ofcom published detailed analysis on foreign interference risks on social media (Register of Risks, December 2024) and is working with the Electoral Commission to understand threats and countermeasures.
  • Illegal Content Codes of Practice (in force since March 2025) require platforms to assess foreign interference risks, remove illegal content, train moderation teams, test algorithms, and operate paid verification schemes transparently.
  • The Foreign Interference Offence threshold is high by design to balance free expression with tackling interference; Ofcom acknowledges Parliament sought this balance but is using existing powers to maximum effect.
  • Ofcom will consult on additional safety measures in July 2026, including crisis protocols for high-risk platforms and algorithm design to exclude priority illegal content from user feeds.
  • Foreign interference requires coordinated response from government, intelligence services, and regulators; Ofcom notes deep expertise lies outside the regulator and service providers, requiring established mechanisms to share and act on relevant information.

Tone

Procedural

Topics

cybersecurityforeign-interferenceonline-safetybroadcastingdisinformation

Key actors

Dame Melanie Dawes, Dame Emily Thornberry MP, Ofcom, Electoral Commission, Lord Richard Allan, Online Information Advisory Committee

Notable line

Hostile state interference in our democracy requires a coordinated response from a range of actors including Government, the intelligence services and regulators.

Key Quotes

This is an area that Ofcom takes extremely seriously and I welcome you raising these important questions.
Dame Melanie Dawes · Opening response to Committee's concerns about foreign interference
… platforms should: • assess the risk of foreign interference occurring on their platforms.
Dame Melanie Dawes · Describing existing platform obligations under Online Safety Act
… the requirement to meet the three conditions in the Foreign Interference Offence is a high bar. We understand that Parliament sought to ensure a balance between tackling foreign interference, and the importance of free expression and legitimate influence activity.
Dame Melanie Dawes · Acknowledging enforcement challenges under Foreign Interference Offence
Hostile state interference in our democracy requires a coordinated response from a range of actors including Government, the intelligence services and regulators.
Dame Melanie Dawes · Setting out need for whole-of-government approach to foreign interference
… the deep expertise in identifying and combatting foreign interference online will always lie outside Ofcom or the service providers.
Dame Melanie Dawes · Explaining limitations of regulator's knowledge and need for intelligence community input
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗

Correspondence with Ofcom relating to disinformation, dated 17 February and 03 February 2026 | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote