Committee publication · Correspondence · 3 February 2026
Correspondence from the Director of UK Public Policy at Meta relating to disinformation, dated 16 January 2026
From: Foreign Affairs Committee
Inquiry: Disinformation diplomacy: How malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy
Summary
Meta's UK Public Policy Director declines to provide a witness for the Foreign Affairs Committee's 2 February oral evidence session on foreign information manipulation and interference, but offers a written submission instead. Meta outlines its approach to detecting and removing coordinated inauthentic behaviour, citing 40,000 staff devoted to safety and security, $30 billion invested over a decade, and removal of over 250 coordinated inauthentic networks globally.
Key findings
- Meta declines to provide an oral witness for the 2 February public evidence session on foreign information manipulation and interference
- Meta reports approximately 40,000 staff working on safety and security and $30 billion invested over the past decade in teams and technology
- Meta claims to have removed more than 250 coordinated inauthentic networks globally to date
- Meta publishes quarterly Adversarial Threat Reports documenting enforcement actions against coordinated inauthentic behaviour operations worldwide
- Meta cites sensitivity of security operations as reason for limiting written information to what can be shared in the public domain
Tone
ProceduralTopics
Key actors
Dame Emily Thornberry MP, Rebecca Stimson, Meta, Foreign Affairs Committee
Notable line
“… we have removed more than 250 coordinated inauthentic networks globally. Working with our industry peers …”
Key Quotes
“… we take these issues extremely seriously and have developed comprehensive programmes to detect, disrupt and remove coordinated inauthentic behaviour (CIB) from our platforms.”
“… we have around 40,000 people working on safety and security, and have invested $30 billion in teams and technology over the past decade.”
“We know that no single company can solve various global threats alone, which is why we share findings about threats we detect with our industry peers and security researchers to help our entire defender …”
“Given the sensitive nature of our security operations, any written information would be limited to what we are able to share in the public domain …”
Source · parliament.uk record ↗