Committee publication · Report · 22 June 2026 · HC 126

4th Report - UK-EU relations a decade on

From: Business and Trade Committee

Inquiry: UK trade with the EU

Government response deadline: 22 August 2026

Summary

This report assesses UK-EU relations a decade after the Brexit referendum, evaluating progress on the Government's 'Reset' announced at the May 2025 Leaders' Summit. The Committee finds that while the Reset established a framework for closer cooperation through the Common Understanding, Security and Defence Partnership, and three sectoral agreements, delivery has been underwhelming. Of 21 recommendations made by the Committee, only four have been completed, 11 are in progress, and six show no progress. The report identifies a 'rhetoric-reality gap': although GDP gains from the Reset are estimated at only 0.5% by 2040, far below the £4% loss attributed to Brexit.

Key findings

  • Only one of six core Common Understanding commitments has been fully agreed—UK association to Erasmus+ at £570 million cost. Four remain in progress; UK participation in the EU's SAFE defence procurement scheme failed after the EU demanded a €6.5 billion participation fee, which the Government deemed unacceptable.
  • The Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) agreement would reduce border frictions on agri-food trade but requires dynamic alignment with EU standards, raising concerns among stakeholders about loss of regulatory autonomy. Trade volumes for UK beef, dairy, and chicken fell 24%, 10%, and 41% respectively between 2019 and 2025.
  • Negotiations on Emissions Trading Scheme linkage and electricity trading are progressing but incomplete. Electricity market decoupling has cost the interconnector fleet €350 million annually; the UK faces the highest electricity prices in the G7, compounded by geopolitical tensions in Iran.
  • No progress has been made on help for touring artists, improved business mobility, or mutual recognition of professional qualifications, despite these being identified UK ambitions. A first UK-EU dialogue on business mobility is expected in Q2 2026.
  • Five key concerns about the Reset's approach: frustration at the 'rhetoric-reality gap'; limited progress on defence industrial cooperation despite European security challenges; delays in electricity trading negotiations; lack of clear long-term strategy beyond the 2026 summit; and controversy over proposals for dynamic regulatory alignment.
  • The Committee found that EU Member State officials and representatives expressed confusion about the UK's strategic end goal for the Reset, with no published roadmap or policy documents outlining the Government's comprehensive vision.

Recommendations

  • Government must act quickly to make more progress on the Reset and ensure future agreements include clear policy workplans and milestones for delivering outcomes.
  • Reopen negotiations on UK participation in future rounds of SAFE and prioritise inclusion in the EU's 'Loan for Ukraine'. Continue bilateral defence partnerships with EU Member States and explore consolidation of the Multilateral Defence Mechanism with the Canadian-led Defence Security and Resilience Bank.
  • Government must commit to consulting with businesses on the SPS agreement throughout the Reset and publish a detailed implementation plan at its conclusion, including support measures for business compliance.
  • Move as quickly as possible to conclude the Emissions Trading Scheme linkage agreement and seek provisional application before formal ratification to allow industry to benefit sooner.
  • Prioritise negotiations on a UK-EU agreement on energy trading, recognising that negotiations have been too slow to start and timelines for completion are too long.
  • Set out the UK's specific ambitions for a Youth Experience Scheme, including participant numbers, visa timeframes, visa requirements, and the Government's position on access to home fee rates at UK universities.
  • Publish underlying data to support the UK's decision to rejoin Erasmus+, provide a full cost-benefit analysis of long-term membership, and clarify the Government's view on continued association in the 2028–2034 budgetary cycle.
  • Urgently prioritise improved mobility and visa arrangements for touring artists, moving beyond commitments to dialogue and delivering practical, measurable outcomes supporting the UK's creative industries.
  • Clearly identify priority services sectors for improved business mobility and set out precise objectives and clear timelines for delivery from the EU.
  • Develop and publish a clear strategic vision and regulatory roadmap setting out the UK's end goal for UK-EU relations, making explicit what the Government is seeking to achieve beyond 2026.

Tone

Critical

Topics

trade-policyuk-eu-relationsdefence-procurementenergy-policyregulatory-alignment

Key actors

Liam Byrne, Sir Chris Bryant MP, Keir Starmer, Ursula von der Leyen, Tom Bradshaw, Oriel Petry, Matt Hinde, National Farmers' Union

Notable line

Thirteen months on, however, stakeholder opinion in the UK has shifted. The prevailing view is that the Reset has been slow to deliver.

Key Quotes

The prevailing view is that the Reset has been slow to deliver.
Committee (Liam Byrne) · Assessing stakeholder sentiment on the Reset's progress after 13 months
The invoice totalled just over £16,000 to the customer for the vehicle to be sat there for the best part of a month.
Toby Ovens · Describing costs incurred due to border delays caused by incorrect UK paperwork at the French border
… the deal was not an automatic win, and could be counterproductive, particularly without derogations in areas like pesticide usage, which could prevent some UK crops being sold from the date of realignment
Tom Bradshaw · NFU President expressing concerns about the SPS agreement's potential impact without appropriate safeguards
… overall decoupling had increased wholesale UK electricity prices by 0.7%
Matt Hinde · National Grid official explaining the impact of leaving the EU's Internal Electricity Market
Failure to secure UK participation in SAFE was a disappointing outcome. It should not preclude further defence cooperation between the UK and the EU.
Committee · Assessing the collapse of negotiations on UK participation in the EU's defence procurement scheme
In our conversations with EU Member State officials and EU representatives in Brussels, Paris, Berlin, and Dublin, we heard time and again how our European allies are simply unclear about what the UK wants.
Committee · Highlighting the lack of clear UK strategic vision for the Reset during committee visits to EU capitals
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗