Committee publication · Correspondence · 15 October 2025 · HC 570

letter, dated 23 September 2025, from the Security Minister to the Speaker relating to terrorism legislation

From: Speaker's Conference (2024)

Inquiry: Speaker’s Conference on the security of candidates, MPs and elections

Summary

Security Minister Dan Jarvis writes to the Speaker on 23 September 2025 setting out the government's position on applying counter-terrorism legislation to harassment and intimidation of MPs. He describes three operational protective measures already deployed—Operation Regency, Operation Bridger, and Operation Ford—and an offender-focused police strategy, while arguing that most online threats to MPs should be handled by territorial police under non-counter-terrorism powers rather than stretched counter-terrorism resources.

Key findings

  • Government has enhanced protective security measures for MPs through Operation Regency, Operation Bridger, and Operation Ford (a dedicated officer network in every police force)
  • An offender-focused police strategy now aims to drive down threats from known offenders with daily actionable intelligence sharing between Parliament and policing
  • Jarvis agrees with the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation that 'in the majority of cases, individual tweets should not be addressed with terrorism powers'
  • Counter-Terrorism Police are managing over 800 live terrorism investigations and thousands of subjects of interest; government argues their resources should prioritise public threats over online harassment of MPs
  • Threats to MPs are currently filtered through Parliamentary Liaison and Investigations team and can be escalated to counter-terrorism policing if threshold is met

Tone

Procedural

Topics

safeguardingcounter-terrorismparliamentary-securitylaw-enforcement

Key actors

Dan Jarvis MBE MP, Rt Hon Sir Lindsay Hoyle, Jonathan Hall KC, Vicki Evans, Jon Savell, Counter Terrorism Policing, Defending Democracy Taskforce

Notable line

… in the majority of cases, individual tweets should not be addressed with terrorism powers.

Key Quotes

… the harassment and intimidation of public office holders instils fear and concern amongst those targeted. I am resolute in working to reduce any such behaviour
Dan Jarvis · opening statement on government commitment to tackling MP intimidation
I would agree with the IRTL that, in the majority of cases, individual tweets should not be addressed with terrorism powers.
Dan Jarvis · stance on proportionate use of counter-terrorism legislation
Counter Terrorism Police are working on more than 800 live investigations, involving thousands of 'subjects of interest' who are suspected of being directly involved in terrorism.
Dan Jarvis · explaining resource constraints in counter-terrorism policing
It is vital that we trust CTP to balance those threats and make determinations of where policing resource is best allocated.
Dan Jarvis · concluding rationale for police discretion on resource deployment
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗