Committee publication · Report · 23 March 2026 · HC 782

10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security

From: International Development Committee

Inquiry: Women, peace and security

Government response deadline: 23 May 2026

Summary

This report assesses the UK's implementation of the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, governed by UN Resolution 1325. Despite international commitments and a National Action Plan (2023–2027), the committee finds the government has failed to translate pledges into action, with reduced funding, depleted expertise, weak multilateral advocacy, and inadequate monitoring undermining the agenda against a backdrop of rising global conflict and gender backlash.

Key findings

  • The UK, as UN Security Council penholder for WPS, failed to convene a single dedicated WPS session during its February 2026 UNSC presidency, representing a significant deprioritisation despite stated commitments.
  • ODA cuts from 0.7% to 0.3% of GNI, coupled with aid reductions, have reduced funding for Women's Rights Organisations by two-thirds and resulted in 20 million fewer women and girls accessing UK-funded programming.
  • FCDO staffing cuts in development and gender expertise—with ~60% of development advisor positions vacant in November 2025—are critically undermining conflict prevention work and meaningful women's participation in peace processes.
  • Only 9.6% of peace negotiators globally are women, yet evidence shows women's participation makes agreements 64% less likely to fail and 35% more likely to last 15+ years; women's participation is declining domestically and internationally.
  • There is no dedicated WPS budget, no cross-government integrated data system for WPS activity and spending, and no consistently applied WPS-specific indicators, making it impossible to assess impact or accountability.

Recommendations

  • Gender equality must not become a footnote in UK diplomacy. The UK should use its international clout to strengthen WPS implementation through multilateral forums, holding gender-sensitive language in resolutions, and prioritising deliverability of commitments into actions.
  • The Government must explain why no dedicated WPS session was convened during its UNSC presidency in February 2026 and list specific WPS actions achieved in country-specific sessions in the past year.
  • The UK should convene a dedicated WPS session the next time it holds the UNSC presidency.
  • The National Action Plan refresh must prioritise meaningful participation and women's contribution to conflict prevention despite the increasing number of global conflicts.
  • The UK should take a more active role in peace processes to ensure women meaningfully participate and work with organisations to embed accountability for WPS breaches.
  • The FCDO must retain development and gender expertise; maintain development experts on WPS with local connections; preserve gender advisor roles; and provide gender advisors to support in-country organisations like GAPS.
  • The Government should provide clarity on how it will protect VAWG, WPS, and PSVI funding long-term and establish transparent, ringfenced budgets rather than non-binding 'protected' status.

Tone

Critical

Topics

gender-equalityconflict-and-peaceinternational-developmentwomen-rightspublic-finance

Key actors

Sarah Champion, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), UN Security Council, Reem Alsalem, Eva Tabbasam, Fawzia Koofi, Chris Elmore, Yvette Cooper

Notable line

"women do not need more promises, they need power protection, and equal participation".

Key Quotes

… women do not need more promises, they need power protection, and equal participation
Sima Bahous, Executive Director of UN Women · On women's exclusion from peace tables and protection amid multiplying wars
More than 100 countries and regional institutions have national and regional action plans, and it has given women in the countries that we work in the language and the legitimacy to demand a seat at the table.
Stephanie Siddall, Women for Women International · On Resolution 1325 as a tool for women's advocacy despite implementation challenges
… beyond facilitation, what is important as a penholder is ensuring that work is "follow[ed] through" and "implemented on the ground".
Reem Alsalem, Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls · On the UK's responsibility as WPS penholder beyond negotiation to implementation
… historic champions of WPS have either "softened, fully withdrawn or like the UK, seemingly deprioritised the agenda".
Conciliation Resources (NGO) · On major donors' retreat from WPS leadership
… when women meaningfully participate in peace processes, the resulting agreement is 64% less likely to fail and 35% more likely to last for at least 15 years
Chris Elmore, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Multilateral, Human Rights, Latin America and the Caribbean · On the strategic value of women's participation in sustainable peace
… the spread of militarization […] could lead to an even more dangerous and violent decade
António Guterres, UN Secretary-General · From 2024 annual WPS report, on increased defence spending at expense of development
Afghanistan is "the front line" of risks to women but stressed that these risks "can reach anywhere, any country".
Fawzia Koofi, former Afghan Member of Parliament · On the global reach of WPS failures beyond specific conflict zones
Gender equality should not become a footnote in UK diplomacy. The UK must use its clout on the international stage to strengthen the implementation of the Women, Peace and Security agenda.
International Development Committee · Main committee recommendation on UK's role as WPS penholder
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗