Committee publication · Correspondence · 15 April 2026

Correspondence with the Minister for Employment, following her appearance before the Committee on Wednesday 11 February 2026

From: Work and Pensions Committee

Inquiry: Employment support for disabled people

Summary

The Work and Pensions Committee wrote to the Minister for Employment on 23 February 2026 following her oral evidence on 11 February, raising detailed questions about Connect to Work evaluation frameworks, Access to Work award reductions, rising reconsideration requests (194 to 1,575 in three years), and funding allocation for disabled people. The Minister responded on 24 March, confirming theory-based evaluation combining management information, fidelity reviews, and longitudinal surveys, explaining award changes reflect consistent guidance application rather than policy change, and stating employment programme expenditure cannot be disaggregated by disability status.

Key findings

  • Connect to Work evaluation combines internal management information, independent fidelity reviews, and large-scale national evaluation with process, outcome, impact and value-for-money strands; early insights report expected 2026, interim 2026/27, final 2030/31
  • Access to Work award reductions stem from consistent application of existing guidance rather than policy change; DWP updated employer guidance clarifying their legal responsibility for reasonable adjustments under Equality Act 2010
  • Reconsiderations increased from 194 (2021-22) to 1,575 (2024-25); Minister acknowledges link to consistency drive but cannot confirm this is sole cause; expects numbers to reduce as guidance beds in
  • Access to Work applications more than doubled 2018/19 to 2024/25 (76,100 to 157,000); DWP addressing backlog through staff recruitment, resource reallocation, and digital system enhancement
  • Government states employment support budget cannot be disaggregated by disability status as programmes serve mixed-ability participants, declining to provide proportion allocated to disabled people

Tone

Procedural

Topics

employment-supportdisability-rightspublic-administrationaccess-to-workbenefit-policy

Key actors

Debbie Abrahams MP, Dame Diana Johnson MP, Angus Gray, Dr Simon Marlow, Lorraine Jackson, National Audit Office, Department for Work and Pensions

Notable line

For the last year we have worked to improve decision-making throughout the scheme by ensuring that guidance is applied with greater consistency, helping to 3 provide a fairer process.

Key Quotes

The NAO said stricter application of these rules has led to some reduced renewal awards, and you suggested that award reductions might be linked to the more consistent application of policy.
Debbie Abrahams MP · seeking clarification on reasons for Access to Work award changes
The number of reconsiderations increased from 194 in 2021-22 to 1,575 in 2024-25.
Debbie Abrahams MP · raising concern about dramatic increase in claimant reconsideration requests
For the last year we have worked to improve decision-making throughout the scheme by ensuring that guidance is applied with greater consistency, helping to 3 provide a fairer process.
Dame Diana Johnson MP · explaining recent Access to Work changes
Applications to the Access to Work scheme more than doubled between 2018/19 and 2024/25
Dame Diana Johnson MP · providing context for increased reconsiderations and backlog
The employment programmes are not exclusively for disabled participants, and will contain a range of abilities. It is not possible to disaggregate the expenditure.
Dame Diana Johnson MP · declining to provide proportion of employment support budget allocated to disabled people
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗