Committee publication · Report · 23 March 2026 · HC 782

Large Print - 10th Report - Peace under pressure: Protecting Women, Peace and Security

From: International Development Committee

Inquiry: Women, peace and security

Government response deadline: 23 May 2026

Summary

The International Development Committee's tenth report examines the UK's implementation of the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, finding that while the UK has made verbal commitments as penholder at the UN Security Council, it has failed to deliver on these commitments in practice. The report identifies critical gaps in funding, staffing expertise, monitoring, and international advocacy, concluding that reduced aid budgets, development staff cuts, and deprioritisation of WPS in multilateral forums are undermining the agenda.

Key findings

  • The UK failed to convene a single dedicated WPS session during its February 2026 UN Security Council presidency, representing a missed opportunity despite penholder responsibilities and stated commitments.
  • The Government has reduced Official Development Assistance from 0.7% to 0.3% of GNI, disproportionately affecting Women's Rights Organisations (funding reduced by two-thirds) and cutting 20 million women and girls from UK-funded programming.
  • Development and gender expertise in the FCDO has been significantly reduced through merger with the Foreign Office, with 60% of development advisor positions vacant as of November 2025; gender advisors requested for Sudan and Gaza operations were never provided.
  • Women's meaningful participation in peace processes remains critically low at 9.6% of negotiators despite evidence that meaningful female participation reduces agreement failure by 64% and increases likelihood of lasting peace by 35%.
  • No integrated cross-government system exists for monitoring WPS expenditure, impact, or outcomes; it is impossible to track how much the UK has spent on WPS over the last fifteen years.

Recommendations

  • The UK should strengthen the implementation of the Women, Peace and Security agenda by using its international clout to advocate for WPS in multilateral forums, holding the line on gender-sensitive language in resolutions, and prioritising deliverability of commitments into actions.
  • The Government should explain why it did not convene a dedicated WPS session during its February 2026 UNSC presidency and set out specific WPS-related actions achieved in country-specific sessions in the last year.
  • The UK should convene a dedicated session on Women, Peace and Security the next time it holds the UNSC presidency.
  • The National Action Plan refresh must prioritise meaningful participation and the contribution of women and marginalised groups in conflict prevention and related processes, particularly given rising global conflicts.
  • The UK should take a more active role in peace processes to ensure women can meaningfully participate, working with organisations to embed accountability for WPS breaches and prioritising gender equality in conflict prevention, resolution and peacebuilding.
  • The FCDO must not lose development or gender expertise; it should commit to maintaining development experts on WPS with local ground connections and provide gender advisors to support organisations like GAPS in-country, with specific detail on achieving this in the Government response.

Tone

Critical

Topics

women-peace-securityinternational-developmentgender-equalityconflict-preventionmultilateral-diplomacy

Key actors

Sarah Champion (Chair, International Development Committee), Chris Elmore (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Multilateral, Human Rights, Latin America and the Caribbean), Fawzia Koofi (former Afghan Member of Parliament), Reem Alsalem (UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls), Eva Tabbasam (Director, Gender Action for Peace and Security), Yvette Cooper (Foreign Secretary), Archie Young (UK Ambassador to the General Assembly)

Notable line

The future of the Women, Peace and Security agenda hangs in the balance. The agenda is more critical than ever against the backdrop of rising conflicts, a global anti–gender movement and a reported backsliding on the rights of women and girls.

Key Quotes

… women do not need more promises, they need power protection, and equal participation
Sima Bahous, Executive Director of UN Women · On women's exclusion from peace processes and decision-making
The future of the Women, Peace and Security agenda hangs in the balance.
Committee summary (Chapter 1 conclusion) · Overall assessment of WPS agenda state
… what is important as a penholder is ensuring that work is "follow[ed] through" and "implemented on the ground".
Reem Alsalem, UN Special Rapporteur · On penholder responsibilities beyond facilitation
… it has given women in the countries that we work in the language and the legitimacy to demand a seat at the table
Stephanie Siddall, Women for Women International · On Resolution 1325's impact as an organising tool
Afghanistan is "the front line" of risks to women but stressed that these risks "can reach anywhere, any country".
Fawzia Koofi, former Afghan Member of Parliament · On the global scope of WPS failures
… when women meaningfully participate in peace processes, the resulting agreement is 64% less likely to fail and 35% more likely to last for at least 15 years
Chris Elmore, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State · Evidence on impact of women's participation in peace agreements
… ignoring gender inequality and failing to meaningfully ensure women, girls and marginalised groups can participate is not "just a missed opportunity, it is a strategic failure".
CARE International · On consequences of deprioritising gender in multilateral work
… historic champions of WPS have either "softened, fully withdrawn or like the UK, seemingly deprioritised the agenda".
Conciliation Resources (NGO) · On shifts in major powers' WPS commitment
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗