Committee publication · Special Report · 22 April 2026 · HC 1830

Large Print - 9th Special Report - Future of UK aid and development assistance: interim report: Government Response

From: International Development Committee

Inquiry: Future of UK aid and development assistance

Summary

This is the UK Government's response to the International Development Committee's interim report on the future of UK aid and development assistance (HC 1330, published 5 February 2026). The Government outlines its positions on multilateral spending, transparency, staffing, bilateral partnerships, and priorities, disagreeing with several Committee recommendations including calls for a multilateral development review and a pause on FCDO 2030 restructuring, while partially accepting recommendations on staffing audits and gender expertise.

Key findings

  • Government disagrees with the Committee's call for a multilateral development review, arguing its Programme Operating Framework and external assessments sufficiently evaluate multilateral organisations' performance.
  • Government disagrees with transparency recommendations, stating it already publishes ODA allocations via Development Tracker and works with partners on communication plans highlighting impact (e.g. Gavi protecting 500 million children, World Bank multiplying every pound fourfold).
  • Government disagrees with recommendation to pause FCDO 2030 restructuring, but partially accepts need for staffing capability assessment, committing to a Workforce Strategy for the Spending Review period.
  • Government partially accepts recommendations on bilateral spend and partnerships, confirming multiyear allocations grant country missions flexibility within geographic budgets and access to central Communities of Expertise.
  • Government agrees with recommendations on ICAI funding, committing to maintain full funding for the Independent Commission on Aid Impact for at least three years (averaging £1.68m annually).

Government position

The Government partially accepts the Committee's recommendations but rejects several key proposals. It disagrees with calls for a multilateral development review, transparency improvements, and pausing FCDO 2030 restructuring, arguing existing mechanisms sufficiently evaluate performance and that restructuring must proceed to meet budget obligations and offer staff certainty. It partially accepts recommendations on staffing audits and bilateral flexibility, committing to a Workforce Strategy and granting in-country missions greater autonomy. The Government agrees to maintain ICAI funding for three years. Overall positioning: the Government acknowledges Committee concerns but prioritises proceeding with planned reforms while emphasising existing oversight mechanisms and commitment to poverty reduction.

Tone

Procedural

Topics

aid-policymultilateral-developmentpublic-financegender-equalitytransparency

Key actors

International Development Committee, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), Foreign Secretary, Minister for Development, World Bank, Gavi, Global Fund, Anoushka Sinha

Notable line

The Government intends to return to spending 0.7% of GNI on ODA when fiscal circumstances allow and will continue to …

Key Quotes

The Government remains firmly committed to international development. Development is an essential part of our global objectives and the delivery of the Government's missions: working with partners …
Government · statement of commitment to development as policy priority
This investment will be targeted strategically to the most effective multilateral organisations in the areas partners consistently say matter most – humanitarian, health, 3 climate & nature and economic development.
Government · explaining rationale for increasing multilateral ODA share
FCDO does not agree that a multilateral development review is required to sufficiently evaluate the performance of the multilateral organisations that the UK provides funding to.
Government · disagreeing with Committee recommendation on multilateral review
The FCDO's funding to multilateral development organisations is scrutinised regularly in line with the Programme Operating Framework (PrOF). This specifies the rules which must be applied when delivering the FCDO's policy and programmes.
Government · justifying existing oversight mechanisms for multilateral spending
9. All UK ODA spending, including for multilaterals, is reported in the Statistics on International Development publication on a calendar year basis.
Government · responding to transparency concerns raised by Committee
The FCDO is committed to ensuring that it has the development capability and technical expertise needed to deliver this government's ambition on development, even as the ODA budget is reduced.
Government · addressing Committee concerns on staffing amid restructuring
In-country missions will have more control over how central expertise is deployed, ensuring development assistance is demand-led and tailored to the local context.
Government · explaining reforms to bilateral partnership approach
The FCDO has raised our ambition, committing that at least 90% of FCDO bilateral ODA programmes will have a focus on gender equality by
Government · setting gender equality target for bilateral programming
View original document →

Source · parliament.uk record ↗