The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,061 contributions

Speeches by Doughty.

Every Hansard contribution by Stephen Doughty this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 281300 of 1,061 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 15 of 54Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

I have spoken regularly in this place in the past, including when I was a member of the Home Affairs Committee, on these issues, and exposed all sorts of different issues that I had serious concerns around. Again, I would get away from focusing on individual platforms because the reality, particularly in terms of what

115
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

We have made it very clear, and I have made clear again to the Committee today, that we are fully committed to upholding the right to free speech. I think it is one of the things that makes this country great. We support laws and institutions that are working to keep the internet free from very harmful content, and we

100
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

No. We just do not comment on individual cases in that way and it would not be appropriate. We are obviously aware of this case and engage in the appropriate way, but US visa policy is for the United States.

40
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

You will appreciate, Mr Brickell, that there are ongoing processes around those individuals, so I am extremely limited in what I can say, but we are obviously aware that the United States has announced visa restrictions on two British citizens. We do not comment on individual cases; we continue to engage with the US on

63
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

I will go back to what I said, which is that we are not talking here about individual comments, viewpoints or expressions on different matters. I strongly believe in freedom of speech; this country does and we have proud record on it. We are not talking about legitimate political discourse here, or expression of differ

134
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

Absolutely, and I have been visiting and engaging in many of the same locations that you and the Committee members have visited. The first thing to say is that disinformation is nothing new. The Russians coined the phrase over a century ago, and we can look at many different examples in history, including extraordinary

818
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

I would be very clear that President Trump is engaged in extremely important efforts at the moment, alongside ourselves, European partners and President Zelensky, to try and find a peaceful, just and sustainable end to the war in Ukraine. We are working very closely with him and his team on that issue and that is what

120
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

The first thing I would say is that the US remains our primary partner in defence and security. It is a unique and special relationship that goes back decades, not least as NATO partners, but also in terms of our own extraordinary bilateral defence, security and intelligence co-operation. Ultimately, decisions for the

96
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

We have excellent teams in our Iran unit. Along with Minister Falconer, I have worked with them very closely on issues relating to, for example, Iranian sanctions—we sanctioned 36 individuals in relation to malign Iranian activity—I am very confident in the advice and the expertise that we receive on these issues.

51
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

We are very clear about the risk from Iran. You will have seen that in the National Security Strategy last year we called out, “years of aggressive and destabilising activity by the Iranian regime which has included activities specifically targeted against UK interests at home and overseas.” I would include the matters

140
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

We do not take either/or decisions like that. We take strategic decisions based in the UK’s national interest, and our national interests cover a range of issues. The Security Minister was very clear about the range of national security threats, and that we absolutely respond appropriately to those. There is a track re

63
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

I am as deeply concerned by any reports of disinformation emanating from China as I am from anywhere else. We will continue to develop our capability to respond. We take a long-term and strategic approach to China, rooted in our national interest. There are huge opportunities with China as a trading partner and a co-op

169
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

We have not publicly attributed any information operations from China in the UK, but you will be aware, and I am sure the Committee is aware, of allegations elsewhere in the world such as in Canada, the Philippines and Taiwan, that their authorities have referred to. Of course, we take information threats and informati

120
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

I think you would agree with me that it is very important that we take any form of attribution or response to any allegations very carefully and seriously. We do attribution on a case-by-case basis. It is not helpful to speculate about potential actors. We take the security of our systems and data very seriously and wh

79
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

What I would say, as we and other colleagues have said before on this issue, is that countries are considered separately, and decisions are made on the evidence. Of course, the political influence tier of FIRS, which came into force at the same time as the enhanced tier, includes all states. You referenced different al

198
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

I do not really want to add anything further on that at this stage, for obvious reasons.

17
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

I am not going to get into that particular question. You will be aware of the reporting, but obviously we investigate any potential threat against the FCDO, or any other part of Government, very seriously and take appropriate measures to respond and build resilience against future attempts.

47
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

The sanctions do work; we know that. They work in terms of the sheer exposure of the organisations, their tactics and techniques, the fact that they are involved in things that might cause them to be sanctioned in the first place. We are very clear about that; that is why we continue to use that as one of the key tools

127
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

Allocations across the board in ODA, as you will know, are under discussion by Minister Chapman. I am happy to write to you with further detail on that. I think there might be a misinterpretation of overall cuts versus cuts in particular programming here. I want to get you the exact detail on that and not give the wron

61
6 Jan 2026Foreign Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 703)

On the second question, I go back to my earlier points about the wider commitment that we have across Government to spend 5% on national security by 2035. Of course, that includes tackling information threats, but I am very happy to write to follow up on that. Again, I do not want to appear reluctant, but rather than g

310
← PreviousPage 15 of 54 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.