The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 374 contributions

Speeches by Berry.

Every Hansard contribution by Siân Berry this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 120 of 374 contributions · most-recent first

Page 1 of 19Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
28 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eleventh sitting)

Huge apologies for my lateness, Sir John. I wish to speak in support of new clause 2 and lend my support to new clauses 6, 23 and 25, all of which seek to honour the commitment that the Government made in their manifesto at the last election. I have huge admiration for the hon. Member for Warrington North, both for her

crimesocial-care
475
28 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eleventh sitting)

The Minister and I have both talked about making choices. The brass tacks are that the Minister has chosen to make huge changes to our court processes, but not to introduce this change in the Bill. There is still the chance to introduce measures into the Bill on Report and make different choices. Will she consider that

crimesocial-care
57
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

I support this clause quite strongly. We heard powerfully from Claire Throssell in oral evidence how important its impact could be. Most Members will have experiences like mine through casework of cases where this clause could help. I have heard from parents and family members so distressed at how their cases have been

crime
346
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

I am happy to have you back in the Chair today, Dr Huq. I wish to oppose the clause and the schedule. I am grateful to the hon. Member for Bolton South and Walkden for pointing out so clearly that the restrictions on appeals will push down hardest on the least advantaged people and will compound injustices in wider soc

crime
555
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

I will speak briefly in support of the amendment, to which I have put my name. Later, I hope to speak about the real difference between viewing evidence—seeing it given in real life, or going into the room where evidence is given—and being able to review it more dispassionately later in writing. Given that we are now p

crime
127
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)

It is great to see you back in the Chair to help us to make our way through the Bill, Ms Jardine. New clause 28 is a probing amendment, and I shall not press it to a Division when the time comes. To give the context for why I have tabled the new clause, I will lay out the experience faced by a young child—I cannot give

crime
539
23 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)

crime
0
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

The Minister has already said “particularly complex or lengthy”, and just then she said “complex and lengthy”. Having rejected an amendment that would have set a limit of five months, will she think again about defining both complex and lengthy more rigorously in the Bill? The explanatory notes say “complex and lengthy

crimesocial-care
76
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

It is very good to see you in the Chair this evening, Ms Jardine; thank you for looking after us. I will speak very briefly in support of the amendment, to which I have added my name. I have spoken already about the many risks piling up with the Bill, and this amendment is one essential mitigation for some of those ris

crimesocial-care
71
21 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eighth sitting)

I will speak as quickly as I can. I support the amendments tabled in this group by the Liberal Democrats, which would limit any increase in the sentencing powers of magistrates beyond 12 months; amendment 34, which was moved by the hon. Member for Bolton South and Walkden; and the Liberal Democrat and Conservative amen

crimesocial-care
575
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

It is great to have you in the Chair, Dr Huq. I am looking forward to today’s debates. I have not tabled any amendments to clause 3, but I want to talk about some necessary changes to the clause that fit in with this group of amendments. I hope the Committee will have patience with me. I want to raise again the princip

crime
316
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

I appreciate the Minister’s comments, but will she clarify what she meant by a particular category of offence? I could not have been clearer in my speech that I did not want to make an exception for protesters. I spoke specifically about people being prosecuted in cases where it was the powerful versus the underdog. Wi

crime
64
16 Apr 2026Press Malpractice

Last month, a national newspaper intruded on the privacy of one of the families bereaved by the meningitis outbreak, publishing information that the family had asked to be kept private. In opposition, Labour promised independent regulation of the press to curb this awful behaviour, so when exactly will the Secretary of

culture-communitymp-performance
55
16 Apr 2026Press Malpractice

4. What steps her Department is taking to help protect the public from press malpractice.

culture-communitymp-performance
15
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)

I have to add my voice to the point that this is an unsatisfactory situation. We have heard time and again from the Minister that the decision about allocation will be made based only on the length of sentence, but in proposed new section 74C(7)(a) to (g) on reallocation—(g) allows for any other matters—there are many

crimefiscal-policy
94
16 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)

On a point of order, Dr Huq. I alerted the Minister earlier to the fact that I was going to say this. I want to ask what can be done to correct the record in respect of the Minister’s comments about a case that I referred to in my speeches on Tuesday and that Tim Crosland referred to during evidence. On Tuesday, the Mi

crime
221
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

We are debating clause 1, which as I understand it will completely remove defendants’ right to elect; the rest of the Bill puts in place procedures whereby other people—judges—will decide whether a jury trial is held. The right to elect a jury trial is being completely abolished. Is that not correct?

crime
51
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

rose—

crime
1
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

The Scottish Green party is a separate party from the Green party of England and Wales, so I cannot vouch for its policies. However, the Green party’s justice policies look in the round at what is effective in reducing crime, rehabilitating offenders and improving society, based on evidence. I am sure that the Scottish

crime
127
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

It is great to see you in the Chair today, Ms Jardine. I oppose clause 1 and its many implications for justice. It takes away the defendant’s right to elect a trial by jury for all either-way offences, which, according to the Bill’s impact assessment, will reduce jury trials by half. That is no minor thing, and I agree

crime
1,639
Page 1 of 19 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.