The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,007 contributions

Speeches by Sackman.

Every Hansard contribution by Sarah Sackman this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 541560 of 1,007 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 28 of 51Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

We take as our starting point the model set out in the IRCC review and the conclusion reached by Sir Brian Leveson, albeit with the caveat you have given, that in his view, the CCBD would achieve at least 20% time savings; he actually says that his personal view is that it would save substantially more time. I can brin

424
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

As I have said this repeatedly to Parliament and this Committee—I will say it again—of course we will publish the modelling, as is usual practice. The reason we have not done that so far is quite simple: what we need to present to Parliament and the public is a clear, holistic view of how the reforms will work in the l

159
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

It is the case that trials are taking significantly longer. I appreciate that the point was made about where you take the starting point. Sir Brian Leveson’s insight is that trials are taking twice as long as they were taking in 2000. Even if one were to take the IfG’s assessment of a 50% increase, that in itself is si

364
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Do you mean in terms of the determination of that?

10
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

No, I don’t. We anticipate a process whereby, at the PTPH, judges are looking at the case management decisions and therefore need to read into the case to understand its nature and gravity and the factual matrix they are dealing with—albeit they are not determining the verdict at that point—to make the sort of assessme

104
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

No, I don’t think that we are moving away from an adversarial position. Under the new process, as Sir Brian and others have articulated, you will have a Crown court trial—because we are in the Crown court, after all—in the usual fashion, where the prosecution will present its case and the evidence will be tested by the

371
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

No. I think perhaps politicians are guilty here; we recognise the significance of these reforms, because something significant is required to address the crisis that we are in, but their radicalism can be overstated. This is not a scrapping of all jury trials—far from it. We expect that at least three quarters of the t

198
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

One of the fundamental things that we have been seeing for some time now is increased demand. The backlogs really began to run out of control from covid onwards, but they were already beginning to rise before then, due to the increased police numbers, as well as more proactive policing and more proactive charging decis

65
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

There are a number of things. We have explored the evidence and the amount of disclosure, so it is the quantum or volume of evidence, as well as the nature of that evidence and its complexity. There will be some of what have been dubbed “inefficiencies”, which were referred to in the previous panel. I do not want the C

122
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Just to complete that point, that is not the only source of inefficiency. We heard from the previous panel that a major constraint and source of inefficiency is lost time and lost sitting days due to the lack of availability in the workforce. That is a major driver, which is why that has been an area of focus for the G

201
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

As I said in an earlier answer, I do not say—and I do not need to say—that jury trials per se are the primary driver of delay. But within that structure, if you take equivalent cases that could be tried either way—that is the easiest comparator—so they could be addressed in the magistrates court before a district judge

103
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

It does to some extent, and I will bring in Amy here.

12
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Chris, you have been responsible for developing the modelling that parliamentarians will see. I wonder if it is worth you explaining that that is based on historical data from actual individual cases. Obviously people will want to unpack that when they see the modelling.

44
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Sir Ashley is no longer here, but I have been very clear in how we have directed officials not to overclaim for the modelling. I do not want to overclaim for the modelling. We need the modelling, because it is what tells us whether this is going to work or not. I am very concerned with that, because that is why we are

192
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

It would be great if it did, but I would rather that we present a conservative estimate of what we can achieve, than that we guess and hope for the best and that all of a sudden, because one no longer has the right to elect, that is going to generate loads of early guilty pleas because that suits my case. I am not goin

116
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

I will endeavour to keep my answers short.

8
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

That is not an assumption that we have made, although when it comes to—

14
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

No.

1
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Chris will correct me if I am wrong, but that is not something that we have factored into the modelling. It might be part of the time saving that is realised. For example, going back to the previous question, it is possible to imagine that in a world where, as here, we pick up on the IRCC’s recommendation to move to ju

132
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Indeed it could.

3
← PreviousPage 28 of 51 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.