The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,007 contributions

Speeches by Sackman.

Every Hansard contribution by Sarah Sackman this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 321340 of 1,007 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 17 of 51Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Does the hon. Gentleman accept that the very same sentence that he is quoting, which admits the fact that there is a degree of uncertainty—we are, of course, looking at a forecast—also accepts that our modelling assumptions, which the IFG itself pursued, are sound? In the same sentence, it recognises that the approach

crimeeconomy-jobs
72
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Does the hon. Gentleman recognise that the central insight of the independent review—independent of Government—was that, absent reform, these backlogs will not come down? To confirm the point, the so-called do-nothing option includes the maximum investment of uncapped sitting days, so it already reflects the impact we

crimeeconomy-jobs
76
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I checked this during the adjournment of the sitting: the CBA’s point relates to new receipts in certain courts, rather than the state of the backlogs, which, as I said, continue to rise. I absolutely welcome the progress in some parts of the country in lowering receipts, which is obviously good news for the courts, bu

crimeeconomy-jobs
78
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I have never sought to sugar-coat the situation in our courts. Does the hon. Member think that one of the reasons why magistrates courts are struggling in parts of the country is because the number of magistrates halved under the last Government?

crimeeconomy-jobs
42
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

What about what Sir Brian said in his report? Is it not right that the report specifically gives the Government scope to go further than his recommendations?

crimeeconomy-jobs
27
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I do not think we are disagreeing about the importance of judicial accountability or the need for a more diverse judiciary. The Deputy Prime Minister is making huge progress on that and has been a real proponent of that, both when he was in opposition and now in government. What I am talking about is the process for wh

crimeeconomy-jobs
106
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

We are working hard.

crimeeconomy-jobs
4
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I think the shadow Minister misunderstands me. I am not critiquing our jury trials which, as I have said, are a cornerstone of British justice. I am trying to understand why he has so little faith in the judges of this country.

crimeeconomy-jobs
42
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

As I think I am hearing from the Opposition, given that clause 3 is really meaty and has lots of aspects and that, I suspect, all hon. Members, including myself, have prepared on the basis of the groupings in the selection list, a lot of the detailed points on which hon. Members want answers may get lost if we try to d

crimeeconomy-jobs
85
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Is the shadow Minister seriously saying that the giving of reasons, constrained by the legal tests that judges have to apply—meeting the criminal standard of proof and applying a logical route to verdict, free from bias and procedural unfairness—is not desirable? I find that an extraordinary proposition.

crimeeconomy-jobs
47
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

I accept that it cannot happen, but equally we do not know what happens in jury deliberation rooms. We do not know how the jury arrived at a verdict. All that a defendant ever finds out is whether they have been acquitted or convicted. One advantage of the Crown court bench division is that the defendant will have the

crimeeconomy-jobs
91
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fourth sitting)

Does the hon. Gentleman recognise that Sir Brian, in his report, gave scope for the Government to go further than his recommendation, should we need to? Can he comment on why no Conservative MP went to Sir Brian when he offered to engage with them today?

crimeeconomy-jobs
46
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

I have visited lots and lots of courts.

crime
8
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

I will not take any more interventions; I want to make progress. The point is that we are already beginning to see the investment aspect of this. The second pillar of how we address the backlog, which many have commented on, is efficiencies, and we have part 2 of Sir Brian’s report. In his speech on his vision for the

crime
161
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

The hon. Member started with a long digression into trial by ordeal. I hope this Committee will not become a trial by ordeal, but I find the brass neck approach to this from the Opposition surprising, given that they cut the Department’s budget in real terms, while we have invested in record levels of sitting days and

crime
205
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

The hon. Lady will have seen that with the presentation of the Bill, as is right and appropriate, a suite of documents and material was made available to Members of this House and the wider public. The factsheet that accompanies the Bill includes a series of scenarios, one of which is literally to do nothing, and looks

crime
251
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

I will just conclude this point. The central insight of the independent review of the criminal courts, in direct answer to the hon. Member for Reigate, borne out by the modelling, which has been externally verified and which we presented in the impact assessment, is that efficiency—however optimistic we are about it—an

crime
100
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

Let me begin by saying that the Bill has been prepared with precisely the people and communities who elected us and gave us our mandate in mind. The Labour party manifesto contained one word on the front cover: “Change”. It was not an acceptance of the status quo—a brittle criminal justice system with record and rising

crime
428
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

The hon. Member is right. Where currently a defendant charged with a triable either-way offence has the ability to choose trial by jury in the Crown court, even in a scenario in which a magistrates court has accepted jurisdiction over their case, that ability to choose is removed by clause 1. Currently, defendants do n

crime
234
14 Apr 2026Courts and Tribunals Bill (Third sitting)

I am not sure who to give way to, but I will give way first to the hon. Lady—I will try to be as fair as I can.

crime
28
← PreviousPage 17 of 51 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.