The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 444 contributions

Speeches by Bool.

Every Hansard contribution by Sarah Bool this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 161180 of 444 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 9 of 23Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
31 Aug 2025Universal Credit: 16 to 24-year-olds

10. What estimate she has made of the number of 16 to 24-year-olds receiving universal credit.

economy-jobslabour-marketcost-of-living
16
31 Aug 2025Universal Credit: 16 to 24-year-olds

According to the Library, in my constituency, the claimant count among those aged 16 to 24 has risen by 46%; that is one of the largest percentage increases in the country. Conservative Members know that the Government have a moral duty not to let our young people learn that a life of benefits is the life for them, so

economy-jobslabour-marketcost-of-living
70
31 Aug 2025Topical Questions

T3. One of the main benefits of saving into a private pension is the tax relief that people get from the Government, which is one of the smartest ways to save for later life. Any move by this Government to cut pension tax relief will devastate savings rates and the adequacy of pension provisions. I would hope that the

labour-marketsocial-carefiscal-policy
96
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Is that because they were not allowed to due to the exclusivity?

12
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Just to understand, you say it does not have operational capacity in water, but CKI owns 75% of Northumbrian Water. What do you mean by that compared to the creditors?

30
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Where did those mainly fail? Which of those issues were the problem because I am sure the regulators might have been on side. I understand the future investment. Where was the weakness on the others? If KKR could, why could others not?

42
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

I appreciate that because I completely understand that need for exclusivity and that that is what KKR would want. They want that 10-week period; it is quite common in legal transactions. I have seen that before. What I do not quite understand is once that period ended, why did you not just reopen it and give the other

67
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

I just wanted to clarify some timings because when Charlie asked earlier on, you said that KKR submitted its bid to Ofwat on 30 May, but you also said that you were aware of KKR potentially drawing out on 29 May, and then not getting the financing. Can you clarify that?

51
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

But either way, you were aware of KKR pulling out, but simultaneously, it put a bid in, we think.

19
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

Okay. Just very quickly on that point: obviously as part of the due diligence, KKR would have been asking Thames Water a lot of questions to seek that comfort. Clearly, you could not give KKR the comfort to be able to get that financial investment sign-off. Obviously I understand about the banks. Chris, I know you said

72
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

I have a very quick question. I understand your explanation about the penalties and the doom loop, but did the KKR bid include paying those penalties and have the creditors built in paying these penalties as part of their bid?

40
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

I will leave it there because I will come back to that a bit later.

15
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

But the creditors were also operating and preparing their own bid alongside KKR. Equally, to have the information that KKR needed, it would have had to speak to the creditors to get the confirmation. So it is like marking its own homework for a bid that then comes out.

49
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

But the creditors are actually given that information because of the loan structure and funding. There could be questions raised about the comfort that KKR could not get because the creditors ultimately wanted the bid.

35
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

It was not paid for—

5
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

I find this very difficult because it is incredibly serious to get to this stage after 10 weeks—

18
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

It almost does not feel like there is an open competition. I appreciate that the creditors have always been waiting in the wings; they have been working basically in parallel with KKR. On the other hand, Sir Adrian, you said that the creditors have contractual control over the company at the moment. I still do not thin

115
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

I am just trying to understand this. In terms of when KKR shared that information, on what basis or grounds did it share it? Because obviously it has incurred a huge financial cost.

33
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

You said about the due diligence reports and so on.

10
15 Jul 2025Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588)

—and then not be able to get your finances over the board. That is very unusual in this day and age.

21
← PreviousPage 9 of 23 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.