Speeches by Blake.
Every Hansard contribution by Rachel Blake this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 501–520 of 600 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 324) “You started to talk a bit about possible practical solutions to this and you started making the distinction between essential services and other services. I am interested in this topic, and the Committee is interested in putting forward practical solutions in our recommendations. There is clearly a challenge in terms o…” | 86 |
| 4 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 324) “Is there evidence that you could share with us about the impact of the £100 excess on older people? I am sure we would be interested to see it.” | 29 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “We have been talking a bit about resilience, and one of the vulnerabilities outlined by the FCA is about capability. Where do you think the real responsibility lies for tackling that vulnerability in capability, in terms of financial education and awareness?” | 41 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill “We have heard a lot this afternoon about investment in the public sector and what the proposals will do to small businesses, but we have not heard the Opposition recognise that this country needs a healthy workforce. The Bill proposes a sustainable and manageable approach to funding that healthy workforce. Will the hon…” fiscal-policyeconomy-jobshealth | 91 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “This has been driven by a sense that fintech companies would be disadvantaged by the £415,000. On the number of claims, you have alluded to 99% being covered by the £85,000. So how do you think that change will balance innovation and risk taking?” | 44 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “Can you suggest any particular remits that you think should be withdrawn? I share and am always interested in this critique of Government policy: things are always added and never taken away. The Committee is really interested to know whether there are specific remits that you would take away.” | 49 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “We have spent much of this session talking about the balance between risk and the impact on consumers. Earlier this year we saw the decrease in the maximum liability for repayments from £415,000 to £85,000. There was some discussion about what was driving that decision. Can you elaborate more on the trade-off between i…” | 59 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “Yes.” | 1 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “Can you elaborate on your final point about deterring financial crime and protecting against it? What might this do to the people trying to commit fraud?” | 26 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “What would that look like?” | 5 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “We have been talking a bit about resilience, and one of the vulnerabilities outlined by the FCA is about capability. Where do you think the real responsibility lies for tackling that vulnerability in capability, in terms of financial education and awareness?” | 41 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “And if it does not have that role, where do you think that responsibility should lie?” | 16 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “Can you suggest any particular remits that you think should be withdrawn? I share and am always interested in this critique of Government policy: things are always added and never taken away. The Committee is really interested to know whether there are specific remits that you would take away.” | 49 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “We have spent much of this session talking about the balance between risk and the impact on consumers. Earlier this year we saw the decrease in the maximum liability for repayments from £415,000 to £85,000. There was some discussion about what was driving that decision. Can you elaborate more on the trade-off between i…” | 59 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “Yes.” | 1 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “Can you elaborate on your final point about deterring financial crime and protecting against it? What might this do to the people trying to commit fraud?” | 26 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “What would that look like?” | 5 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “This has been driven by a sense that fintech companies would be disadvantaged by the £415,000. On the number of claims, you have alluded to 99% being covered by the £85,000. So how do you think that change will balance innovation and risk taking?” | 44 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417) “And if it does not have that role, where do you think that responsibility should lie?” | 16 |
| 27 Nov 2024 | Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 416) “ That does not get to the answer to my question, which was about progress towards that quite significant target of £275 million extra by the end of this calendar year, based on those staff. I understand your explanation that they were going to go, and now they do not have to go, but I am not clear on the progress …” | 90 |