Speeches by Kohler.
Every Hansard contribution by Paul Kohler this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 221–240 of 452 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) “In answer to the hon. Member for Broadland and Fakenham, our new clause 23 addresses the weaknesses in the existing clause 21. According to research by the National Centre for Accessible Transport, 90% of disabled bus users report facing barriers to using the bus network. Those include space constraints, poorly designe…” transportlocal-government | 433 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) “We welcome the powers in clause 23, which enables local transport authorities to design and deliver grants directly to bus operators in their areas. It is a clear step in the right direction, placing real tools in the hands of local authorities, which know their communities best and are best placed to shape the service…” transportlocal-government | 210 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) “We remain of the view that without the amendment, the proposals will not give small bus companies the benefits that we are seeking to achieve. We are not convinced that that can be done without the explicit mention of small bus companies, as provided by the amendment.” transportlocal-government | 47 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting) “I thank the hon. Gentleman for those comments on our amendment, but what is the point of including anything in proposed new subsection (2) then? Following his argument, nothing needs to be there.” transportlocal-government | 33 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) “I beg to move amendment 56, in clause 23, page 18, line 42, at end insert— “154B Consideration of operator size in grant allocation (1) When exercising powers under section 154A, a local transport authority in England may have regard to the size of the operator when determining the amount of a grant and the conditions …” transportlocal-government | 173 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) “I will press it to a vote. Question put, That the amendment be made.” transportlocal-government | 14 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting) “I completely agree with the hon. Member. With the welcome increase in active travel and the number of cyclists, we need to address the conflicts that arise on the road. If one goes to the continent, it is part of their DNA—cyclists, motorists and pedestrians understand their relationship—but the same is not true in thi…” transportlocal-government | 236 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting) “There is a lot to cover, but I will not take as long as the shadow Minister. Amendments 40 and 42 are sensible, as making guidance mandatory rather than permissible would keep the right balance. This is clearly an issue for many people, and having clear Government guidance on the accessibility of stopping places would …” transportlocal-government | 497 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting) “Is there not a contradiction? Subsection (2) seems to suggest that there are ways of designing out the problem, whereas subsection (1) bans all new floating bus stops. If subsection (1) were offering a moratorium until the design issues had been addressed, we could support it, but subsections (1) and (2) do not sit wel…” transportlocal-government | 58 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting) “Clause 28 introduces powers for local authorities to make byelaws for buses. That is welcome, and I agree that the behaviour that the clause already lists should be prohibited. There is, however, a clear omission. With passengers already paying extortionate fares to be packed in like sardines on buses, we should at lea…” transportlocal-government | 797 |
| 30 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Fourth sitting) “Clause 14 is so important, because it is about socially necessary routes—those that are critical to the community. It explicitly includes employment and, as the Minister conceded last week, also catches things such as hospital appointments, GP appointments and education. Throughout the Committee stage, the Minister has…” transportlocal-government | 781 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting) “Okay—sorry.” transportlocal-government | 1 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting) “The Liberal Democrats strongly support amendment 39, which was tabled by the hon. Member for Brighton Pavilion. As has been said, it is remarkably similar to, if not the same as, an amendment that we tabled in the House of Lords. It rightly proposes to expand the definition of “socially necessary local service” to incl…” transportlocal-government | 200 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting) “I beg to move amendment 66, in clause 14, page 9, line 23, at end insert— “(4B) When the list of socially necessary local services required by subsection (3)(ba) is reviewed or amended, the relevant authority or authorities must— (a) assess the overall adequacy of the existing network of local services in their area or…” transportlocal-government | 247 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting) “Amendments 54 and 74 would establish a real safety net for socially necessary routes. Amendment 54 would place a duty on local authorities to step in to deliver a service when no commercial operator will do so, while placing a reciprocal duty on the Government to provide financial support to enable it. Amendment 74 wou…” transportlocal-government | 150 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting) “I will be more brief. [Hon. Members: “Hear, hear.”] I have two points to make. I suspect that many of the shadow Minister’s points could be drawn from Hansard 40 years ago when bus deregulation was introduced. The great flaw of bus deregulation was it allowed private providers to cherry-pick profitable routes, leaving …” transportlocal-government | 153 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting) “It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Dr Allin-Khan. My party has little to say on this group. We are supportive of clauses 5 and 6, although the hon. Member for Broadland and Fakenham made a good point, and we would like to hear the Minister’s views on it.” transportlocal-government | 51 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting) “Is the Minister confident that that money is sufficient to protect socially necessary services?” transportlocal-government | 14 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [ Lords ] (Third sitting) “I beg to move amendment 54, in clause 14, page 10, line 26, at end insert— “(4A) Where a socially necessary route has been identified in accordance with section 138A(15) of the Transport Act 2000, and no alternative operator has implemented the service within a period of six months, the relevant local authority must ta…” transportlocal-government | 334 |
| 25 Jun 2025 | Train Frequency: Sutton and Cheam “Worcester Park is a station that my hon. Friend the Member for Sutton and Cheam (Luke Taylor) and I know well as it is on the boundary of both our constituencies, and I confirm that my constituents face the same issues of overcrowding. SWR acquired 90 high-capacity Arterio trains to address this issue back in 2019, yet…” transport | 136 |