The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 495 contributions

Speeches by Shah.

Every Hansard contribution by Naz Shah this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 361380 of 495 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 19 of 25Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I beg to move amendment 94, in clause 1, page 1, line 20, at end insert “, and (c) is acting for their own sake rather than for the benefit of others.” This amendment requires that a person requesting assistance must be acting for their own sake, not the benefit of others. This amendment reflects the proposed changes i

healthsocial-care
63
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eleventh sitting)

I want to understand the Minister’s point about multiple words. We have the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, referring to both coercion and pressure, and undue influence is also included. Those three terms are used in the same Act. Undue influence is also included in multiple additional statutes—ove

healthsocial-care
94
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eleventh sitting)

Many of us on the Committee are first-timers. My understanding is that in a normal Government process we would have gone out to consultation. We are talking about coercion and undue influence, and undue influence in particular is not something that does not appear on the statute books in other legislation, as the Minis

healthsocial-care
258
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Eleventh sitting)

Earlier, the hon. Member gave some examples of subtle encouragement or undue influence. If an elderly person has only one living relative, and they could benefit from their will, the encouragement could be so subtle. They could say to their dad or mum, “This an option available for you,” and not necessarily encourage o

healthsocial-care
204
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

The hon. Member may recall that we heard from the former head of the CPS in the oral evidence sessions, and I asked him whether the Bill would address concerns about such prosecutions. I absolutely agree with my hon. Friend the Member for Spen Valley that we want to address that. However, this Bill is not the route to

healthsocial-care
69
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

To come back to an earlier point—I want to make these points, simply because it is really important that we get them on the record—my hon. Friend the Member for Rother Valley talked about undue influence and encouragement perhaps being archaic terminology. However, just last year, the Digital Markets, Competition and C

healthsocial-care
98
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

I thank my hon. Friend for being so generous with her time. To come back to the CPS’s terminology, does she agree that, in an ideal situation, the Bill would be so safe that we would not need to look at that CPS definition? The Bill would be so tightly defined that nobody could be prosecuted for coercing somebody into

healthsocial-care
66
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

In response to the intervention of my hon. Friend, we are here to make the Bill as safe as possible, but this is a new thing. When the Bill returns to the House, I have to make a decision on whether to support a new Bill that is of such huge magnitude to our communities and the whole country. This Committee is the only

healthsocial-care
220
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

To build on that, I referred to the Court of the Appeal earlier, but when it comes to someone giving their organs, I think from the age of 12 or 13—I will try to find the reference—the words “undue influence” are used in the legislation. It comes back to the crux of my argument; I would like to understand why my hon. F

healthsocial-care
83
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

The principle of statutory interpretation means that by mentioning one thing, we exclude others, so it is my understanding that having the terms coercion and pressure in the Bill excludes undue influence. Will my hon. Friend, who has clearly gone through this in detail, also comment on the fact that section 2A of the S

healthsocial-care
61
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

I share my hon. Friend’s concerns about the Bill not being tightened and fit for purpose. We cannot afford for those people to slip through the net. One woman’s death is one too many. One older person’s death is one too many. That is the bar we have to set. I come back to the words of Dr Jamilla: she said, “Yes, absolu

healthsocial-care
406
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

I have to respectfully disagree with the right hon. Member that this is a settled position. I also challenge, on the record, what the Minister said. I struggle to understand how the Minister and the Government can say that this is a settled position without having gone to consultation on the Bill and without having an

healthsocial-care
268
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

My hon. Friend makes a valid point. There has already been a test case, and the Court of Appeal has ruled that undue influence is relevant to medical decisions and that doctors must look at it. If that is already a ruling, I struggle to understand the resistance to adding the words “undue influence” to a Bill that, in

healthsocial-care
95
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

No, I was talking about another hon. Member, not the Minister. We already have laws to protect people from domestic violence, but that does not mean that they necessarily access them.

healthsocial-care
31
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

I thank my hon. Friend, but I feel that the point is being missed. It is true that there is no framework, but for somebody to get to this point in the first instance they need to have a terminal illness. There is a framework around domestic violence, and domestic violence laws exist for everybody. Frameworks already ex

healthsocial-care
155
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

I would like to hope that that would never happen; I have a huge love of the NHS and of the people I know in it who make decisions every day, particularly given all the cuts—even more so, post covid. But there is that risk; I would like to hope that it is very small. When it comes to mental health, the debate is simila

healthsocial-care
351
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Lady. Just to put it out there, to begin with on amendment 23, the Court of Appeal, in the case of “Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment)”, held that undue influence was relevant to medical decisions and said that doctors must check for it. Undue influence is about power imbalan

healthsocial-care
419
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

Does the hon. Lady share my concern? My understanding is that, in normal parliamentary business, if the Government announce any changes to the law in the press first, they are usually rebuked by Mr Speaker in the Chamber. I appreciate that this is a private Member’s Bill, but a Guardian piece yesterday outlined how we

healthsocial-care
198
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

I have a concern about what the Minister says. As one psychiatrist put it, the Bill is very novel and untested. The MCA has not been tested. Now the Government say that this will work, without consultation or any impact assessment. I struggle to understand that. Does the hon. Lady share my concern that this does not fe

healthsocial-care
59
12 Feb 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Tenth sitting)

May I take the hon. Member back to the point of clause 24, and the issue of suicide and the terminology there? Perhaps the Minister could respond as well, although I am not sure how that would work in this Committee. What I think we are doing in clause 24 is to decriminalise encouraging suicide. That is my understandin

healthsocial-care
93
← PreviousPage 19 of 25 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.