The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 1,749 contributions

Speeches by Pennycook.

Every Hansard contribution by Matthew Pennycook this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 1,4411,460 of 1,749 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 73 of 88Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

That is a really good question. This is a really important part of the Government’s plan on housing and planning more generally, because we have been clear that this has been a severe constraint over recent years. We cannot meet housing need across England purely on a local level. There is a missing tier of planning at

318
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

It happens already, so it would not be something new. If a particular local authority or groups of local authorities under the strategic planning framework that we want to introduce were to come forward and say, “X location is in a sustainable place and has good transport links, etc. We want to build a large-scale deve

222
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

That is a useful point that we should mention. The New Towns Taskforce has been asked to come up with a prospectus for how these things are taken forward. The finance is one part, but taking this back to design and quality, we want these new large-scale communities to be examples of exemplary development. Again, the ta

81
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

That will be determined through conversations with the Treasury at the appropriate point when we have a defined list of sites we are looking at. I do not know if Jo wants to say more, but I am limited in what I can say on that at this point.

49
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

I do not expect the scenario that you are setting out to apply in many cases. I say that because the New Towns Taskforce has already gone out with a call for—expressions of interest might be too strong—a general sense from local authorities to provide evidence precisely as to whether there are sites in their areas that

243
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

We will make a judgment when we see what sites they bring forward. Just to be very clear, we gave them 12 months to report back on the complete list of sites. We have said to them that if there are sites that they think meet the criteria and it is not in question whether they will be on the final list, then they can pu

89
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

No, not necessarily.

3
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

The Government take steps to start to deliver and work up the detailed plans for the sites that will be chosen. Just to be very clear, what we wanted to do by setting up an independent taskforce was to draw on the wealth of expertise that is on it, under Sir Michael Lyons and Dame Kate Barker as chair and deputy chair,

129
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

Generally, if you want protection from speculative development, get a local plan in place. Your local authority has given no evidence of progress towards a local plan. We need to see that in all parts of the country.

38
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

Openness is one of the general purposes of the green belt that the definition of grey belt will have to have regard to. In terms of NPPF responses in particular, I do not think so, off the top of my head.

41
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

We have not done that assessment centrally because the green-belt reviews that will need to take place will be done by local authorities. There are some local authorities out there that have already reviewed their green belt. They have a fair sense of what the lower-quality sites are within it and what might qualify as

231
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

How are we going to enforce the golden rules? We proposed golden rules. We are looking carefully at whether those golden rules are right, in particular benchmark land value and whether that would operate in the way we want. We have been very clear that there are two routes to green-belt release that we could touch upon

214
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

It is important to be very clear—and this is clear in the NPPF document—that land safeguarded for environmental reasons, such as national parks and habitat sites, will retain those protections under the proposal. We are not talking about interfering on those sites. When it comes to the green belt more generally, we hav

396
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

Yes, “I can put the blame on the Planning Inspectorate for that decision. We refused it.” In some ways it is therefore not cost-free but there is an issue that we have to deal with. There are a range of interventions available to Ministers. I just mentioned that, in extremis, we can take the local plan off a local auth

220
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

You are right, and this is where the incentives as we have them are not quite correct. Local authorities that do not have an up-to-date local plan in place will suffer from applications made outside of the local plan, and that can go to the Planning Inspectorate and be approved on appeal. For lots of local authorities

82
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

It is a very good question. At a minimum, we are minded to take forward some of the reforms in the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act in terms of digital planning. Some of this is about how you make the planning process more accessible to a wider range of people. Digital planning and proper spatial planning that can be

517
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

There is a separate and distinct debate about design codes and whether they are appropriately rolled out on a local-authority-wide area or whether they are better targeted at specific large sites, for example some of the large sites that might come through as a result of the NPPF changes, or the new towns, where you mi

507
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

I hope I will be returning to your Committee at points in the future, and I will be more than happy to hear views from the Committee in particular about what NDMPs should comprise and how they should operate.

39
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

Yes, up-to-date local plans that are in place now will remain in place. We are not going to seek to use call-in powers to take those local plans off people. What we have been very clear about—I do not know if I am pre-empting a question—is that we want to see universal coverage of local plans. It is completely unaccept

115
20 Nov 2024Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 432)

No, the local plan—let us break it down into what that means. Local plans will allocate a set number of sites for permission. That is the basis of decision making. We can talk about how the new revised standard method will work through.

43
← PreviousPage 73 of 88 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.