The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 840 contributions

Speeches by Evans.

Every Hansard contribution by Luke Evans this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 81100 of 840 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 5 of 42Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 Feb 2026 Pharmacy First: Withholding Payments

(Urgent Question): To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care if he will make a statement on the withholding of Pharmacy First payments to pharmacies.

healtheconomy-jobscost-of-living
28
12 Feb 2026 Pharmacy First: Withholding Payments

It is a regret that I have had to summon the Minister here to answer questions, and surprise, surprise—

healtheconomy-jobscost-of-living
19
9 Feb 2026 Standards in Public Life

May I thank the Chief Secretary for his statement about the new rules and legislation that he is bringing forward? I have missed something, though. Can he point to what he is bringing forward that would stop a Prime Minister from appointing a twice-sacked best friend of the world’s greatest paedophile?

mp-performancecrimeother
51
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

Does my hon. Friend agree that it is really important that we get clarity from the Government on that point, because there could be individual documents, as opposed to a report? The independent committee can produce a report, but we need to know whether individual documents that could be challenged could be put out if

mp-performancedefenceother
64
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

Is the wider point not that, if the Prime Minister had been duped, he would have released the papers back in September when we had the Standing Order No. 24 debate or put them out there now, rather than leaving it until this debate forced his hand? The only reason some papers are being released is that his hand has bee

mp-performancedefenceother
77
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

Can my hon. Friend tell us what we can learn about the documentation, and how the investigation was run back then? As he pointed out, Mandelson was exonerated, yet other papers were found, and suddenly he was guilty. It would be helpful to understand what needs to be done to ensure that we have the right information, a

mp-performancedefenceother
70
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

We have heard during the course of this debate that a manuscript amendment to amendment (a) will be moved, stating: “which shall instead be referred to the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament”. Does my hon. Friend share my concern that all the information we are requesting will, under that amendment, go t

mp-performancedefenceother
135
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Troy fell because leaders ignored the advice given when the horse was at the gate, and Prime Ministers fall for the same reason. The Prime Minister is either saying that his judgment was so catastrophic that he did not see what all of us have seen instinctively or that he chose to ig

mp-performancedefenceother
362
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

“Beware of Greeks bearing gifts.” That is a slightly obscure quote from a Trojan priest—the one who spotted the danger. Many Members will know the wider story of the Trojan horse. The moral of that story is that warnings were there but were ignored. That is fundamental to what we are seeing today. Troy did not fall bec

mp-performancedefenceother
492
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

Does my right hon. Friend believe it is conceivable that the Government did not ask, “Is there any kompromat on the British ambassador to the US?” The idea seems incredulous. As he rightly points out, this has been known about for years.

mp-performancedefenceother
42
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

The hon. Lady’s point is exactly right: this information was in the public domain, often in the US. One of the questions that the Government have not answered is whether the US was asked if there were any concerns. This relationship was public—we knew that it existed—so was the US asked for any information, or about an

mp-performancedefenceother
73
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

rose—

mp-performancedefenceother
1
4 Feb 2026Lord Mandelson

My hon. Friend is making excellent points. It is a surprise not to see the Prime Minister answering these questions himself. At the end of the day, he made the decision to appoint Mandelson to the post of ambassador, so he must explain his decision-making process, and what he knew and when. Why is he not here?

mp-performancedefenceother
57
3 Feb 2026Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill

I would credit her. She is a credit to the hon. Gentleman’s family for what she has managed to achieve. The key point I am trying to get to is that, when those people leave their doorstep, is it fair that the choice they have made to have only two children is simply thrown out the window, because an extra £3,650 is now

cost-of-livingeconomy-jobssocial-care
126
3 Feb 2026Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill

rose—

cost-of-livingeconomy-jobssocial-care
1
3 Feb 2026Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill

I just see the irony of the hon. Member talking about linking this to alcohol, which is a serious problem. Gambling is a serious problem as well, and his party has directly linked this to gambling, even though this is not a hypothecated tax. Could he explain the dichotomy between the two?

cost-of-livingeconomy-jobssocial-care
52
3 Feb 2026Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill

The hon. Lady talks about speaking for the public, but consistently, in all polling, 60% of Brits want to see this policy stay in place. What does she say to them?

cost-of-livingeconomy-jobssocial-care
31
3 Feb 2026Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill

There are not many on the Opposition Benches—the hon. Gentleman’s party won the last election—but we know that the public support keeping this cap in place. Any poll conducted in the last few years has suggested that, on average, 60% of people think that the cap should remain. Why does the hon. Gentleman think the Brit

cost-of-livingeconomy-jobssocial-care
63
3 Feb 2026Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

cost-of-livingeconomy-jobssocial-care
6
3 Feb 2026Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill

Fairness matters, not only to those receiving the support but to those making the difficult choices without it. During the short time I have, I will talk about the principles and then the context. I come to this subject thinking about the publican in my constituency who has two children and who wakes up in the morning,

cost-of-livingeconomy-jobssocial-care
145
← PreviousPage 5 of 42 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.