The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 517 contributions

Speeches by Farnsworth.

Every Hansard contribution by Linsey Farnsworth this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 141160 of 517 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 8 of 26Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Riel Karmy-Jones, may I ask you the same question, please?

10
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

To clarify, Kirsty Brimelow, are you saying that you disagree with the Government removing the right to elect?

18
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

No, I had finished.

4
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

This is a question for all of you. The Government have proposed to remove the right for defendants to elect a jury trial in either-way cases, which goes beyond what Brian Leveson suggested, albeit I think he made some comments that he did not think it was a bad idea, if it was what the Government wanted to do. Do you a

75
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Can I clarify something? Are you suggesting that victims do not withdraw because of waiting through the Crown court list, and that they all withdraw before that point because of the investigation?

32
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Good afternoon. I am Linsey Farnsworth, the Member of Parliament for Amber Valley and a former Crown prosecutor for over two decades, so I am familiar with magistrates and Crown courts. My interests are as per the register, but those of relevance to today are that I am the co-chair of the APPG on legal and constitution

68
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

I will focus on the magistrates court aspect of the changes. The Leveson report talked about removing the right to elect a Crown court trial for certain low-level offences, but the Government have decided to go further than that. Can you explain the rationale for that decision?

47
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

That would be really useful; thank you.

7
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

That could be a bonus time saving, then.

8
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

I will focus on the magistrates court aspect of the changes. The Leveson report talked about removing the right to elect a Crown court trial for certain low-level offences, but the Government have decided to go further than that. Can you explain the rationale for that decision?

47
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

That could be a bonus time saving, then.

8
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Can I clarify something? You said that you estimate 1% to 2% savings in Crown court time. Are you just talking about how much time is saved in the actual hearings in the courtroom, or are you taking into account other savings within the criminal justice system, like the work undertaken to summons jurors, to deal with j

70
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Sticking with modelling, but from a slightly different angle, there has been a lot of focus on the length of time that a jury trial takes and the consequence, or lack of consequence, for the backlog. Has there been any modelling or consideration of other factors of jury trials and the impact on the backlog? One example

184
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Are we moving on to the magistrates?

7
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Last year, 4,283 cases were in that situation, so only went to the Crown court because the defendant elected Crown court trial. Straightaway, the measure means that 4,283 cases fewer would have gone to the Crown court last year.

39
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

No, no, we are talking about different things here, I think—electing from the magistrates. At the moment, in a mode of trial hearing—as I am sure you know, but just in case anyone does not—the magistrates consider representations and decide whether their sentencing powers are sufficient. If they are sufficient and equi

140
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Sticking with modelling, but from a slightly different angle, there has been a lot of focus on the length of time that a jury trial takes and the consequence, or lack of consequence, for the backlog. Has there been any modelling or consideration of other factors of jury trials and the impact on the backlog? One example

184
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Is there anything that is likely to get—

8
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Riel Karmy-Jones, may I ask you the same question, please?

10
13 Jan 2026Justice Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1602)

Do you know what proportion of those successful appeals are as a result of the victim or witness not wanting to go through, essentially, a retrial?

26
← PreviousPage 8 of 26 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.