The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 168 contributions

Speeches by Hollinrake.

Every Hansard contribution by Kevin Hollinrake this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 4160 of 168 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 3 of 9Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
30 Mar 2025Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill

The Minister says that the solution that he has alighted on meets his manifesto commitment, but his manifesto says, “This new system will level the playing field between the high street and online giants”. That is not what the provision does—not exclusively. He knows that it levies extra taxes, extra business rates, on

fiscal-policyeconomy-jobseducation
70
25 Mar 2025 Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill)

What would the hon. Gentleman say to businesses that are trying to make their numbers add up? In its manifesto and previously, the promise—the commitment—of the Labour party was to level the playing field between online giants and small businesses, but, as the hon. Gentleman can see, that is not what is happening here.

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
105
25 Mar 2025 Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill)

On a point of detail, the Minister says the Bill is a “first step”, so will there be further reforms, following these reforms, to the rest of the business rates system to meet his manifesto commitment to replace the current business rates system completely?

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
44
25 Mar 2025 Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill)

The Minister has already said, as he has in previous speeches, that this is a “first step”, but now he says it is a “permanent” measure. I agree with him that business wants certainty, so it is important that businesses understand: is this now a permanent position that will not be changed, or a first step?

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
56
25 Mar 2025 Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill)

I thank the Minister for his explanation of the Lords amendments. We shall not agree, and I will explain why. I thank the Lords for their careful consideration of the Bill; in particular, I thank the noble Lord Jamieson and the noble Baroness Scott for their scrutiny and amendments. The legislation comes at a critical

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
165
25 Mar 2025 Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill)

My right hon. and learned Friend makes a very good point. These are difficult times. As she knows, I was in business for 30 years, and we go through some difficult times. Many people think that business is easy, but it is not, particularly at times like this, when confidence, including consumer confidence, has gone so

economy-jobsfiscal-policylocal-government
1,468
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

I am concerned about the points that my right hon. Friend has raised. The Government talk about abolishing a layer of government, but they are actually introducing a new layer of government: the strategic authorities, which will have the ability to push housing from urban areas into rural areas such as my right hon. Fr

housingenvironmentlocal-government
64
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

We could talk with the Minister for Housing and Planning, the hon. Member for Greenwich and Woolwich (Matthew Pennycook) about making such amendments to the legislation as it passes through Committee. I have other questions. Is Natural England sufficiently resourced to carry out its work? How long will it be before the

housingenvironmentlocal-government
298
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

I agree that, in order to be fair to areas that include protected landscapes and national parks, that should be a consideration. The removal of powers from councillors will only become apparent to many residents when they see a green notice on a nearby telegraph pole and contact their local councillor to express their

housingenvironmentlocal-government
269
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

It is totally unfair. In my view, it is cynical gerrymandering.

housingenvironmentlocal-government
11
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

My right hon. Friend is right to express her concerns. What everyone wants to see is fairness. We would expect everybody to carry a fair share of the extra housing, but that is not what is happening. [Interruption.] Labour Members should go and have a word with the House of Commons Library if they do not agree. They ca

housingenvironmentlocal-government
232
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

I can guarantee that we will support measures that we think will be successful. The hon. Gentleman brings up some of the work we tried to do in the previous Parliament, some of which was successful. Other things were unsuccessful, including our solution on nutrient neutrality, which was blocked by his party by about 10

housingenvironmentlocal-government
97
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

I agree with that, and I made the same point from the Back Benches on many occasions, including about Labour-run York, which has just put a local plan in place for the first time since 1956. There are understandable concerns that compulsory purchase orders are an extension of the Government’s attacks on farmers. Tim Bo

housingenvironmentlocal-government
306
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

How is what the Minister is saying consistent with what he said on the Floor of the House on 9 December, when he said: “the changes are designed to… focus the time of elected councillors on the most significant or controversial applications”—[Official Report, 9 December 2024; Vol. 758, c. 673.]— which he is going to di

housingenvironmentlocal-government
79
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

I am very happy to have a debate with the Housing Minister—he is welcome to intervene on me. I suggest that he reads clause 46 as well. Of course, it is also a fact that 14 Cabinet Ministers, including the Deputy Prime Minister, the Home Secretary and the Health Secretary, all campaigned to block housing developments i

housingenvironmentlocal-government
62
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

I do not disagree that there were some flaws in the scheme. Nevertheless, around 340,000 people made it on to the housing ladder through that process. They include people in my constituency and probably people in the hon. Member’s constituency. We recognise the need to go further. That is why we commissioned work by Ch

housingenvironmentlocal-government
210
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

It is right to say that the vast majority of applications are consented to by planning committees. Removing councillors’ right to vote on them is absolutely the wrong thing to do, and Labour must be honest with the public that that is exactly what is happening.

housingenvironmentlocal-government
46
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

I will give way a final time, and then I will make some progress, if I can.

housingenvironmentlocal-government
17
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

My right hon. Friend raises a very important point. Constituencies such as his and mine that include those protected landscapes do not seem to have that considered or catered for in the housing targets, particularly the new ones that we have before us. Again, I am very keen to discuss with the Minister how we might add

housingenvironmentlocal-government
192
24 Mar 2025 Planning and Infrastructure Bill

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right. What have the Deputy Prime Minister and the Chancellor got against first-time buyers? We helped 1 million first-time buyers to get on the housing ladder through Help to Buy and discounts on stamp duty. The Government scrapped both those schemes.

housingenvironmentlocal-government
47
← PreviousPage 3 of 9 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.