Speeches by Madders.
Every Hansard contribution by Justin Madders this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 701–720 of 1,011 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “I feel that we are going to have a few of these conversations again this year. Heaven forbid the previous Government ever amended anything in Committee! We knew the Bill was issued at a challenging pace and that it was large, so there were always going to be elements that needed clarification at this stage. It is right…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 266 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “I beg to move amendment 74, in clause 46, page 51, line 4, at end insert— “(4A) ‘Workplace’ does not include any part of a workplace used as a dwelling.”. This amendment would ensure that the right of access does not include access to dwellings. This important amendment adds some clarity about the right of access to a …” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 243 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “Just that I welcome the support from the shadow Minister, albeit for the wording rather than the spirit of the amendment. Amendment 72 agreed to. Amendment made: 73, in clause 46, page 51, leave out lines 1 and 2 and insert— “(3) A ‘qualifying trade union’ is a trade union that has a certificate of independence.”—(Just…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 64 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “The clause makes provision for trade unions and employers to negotiate access agreements, under which employers will be required to permit trade union officials to enter workplaces for various purposes, such as recruitment, organising, and meeting and providing support to existing members. This is particularly signific…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 239 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “I beg to move amendment 72, in clause 46, page 50, line 30, leave out “listed” and insert “qualifying”. This amendment and other amendments to this clause would require a trade union to have a certificate of independence in order to have the rights provided for in the clause.” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 49 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “I understand the point the hon. Member makes. I do not think it is helpful to get into hypotheticals about what might or might not happen under the statutory probation system, given that we have not really fleshed out the details. That will happen in due course, but it is already the law that statements of terms and co…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 144 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “Probation.” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 1 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “There was a mix of responses there. We heard from the hon. Member for Torbay that the Liberal Democrats welcome the clause, I think the shadow Minister was generally supportive, albeit not explicitly, and then the hon. Member for Bridgwater was fairly critical. I will address the points made by all three individuals. T…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 495 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “Good morning, Mr Mundell. It is a pleasure to see you in the Chair. Happy new year to you and to all members of the Committee. I start by making my customary reference to my declarations in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. This, I hope, is a fairly straightforward and uncontroversial clause; it does exactl…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 228 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “We have had a good debate. The main focus of the shadow Minister’s questioning was the 2% issue. The first thing to say is that, as it stands, the 10% figure will remain. We are simply giving ourselves the power to reduce it to 2% following consultation, although as various Committee members have powerfully set out, in…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 275 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Sixteenth sitting) “The clause will enable us to strengthen the protections against blacklisting. The Consulting Association scandal, in which thousands of union workers were blacklisted, underscored the need for strong anti-blacklisting laws. Blacklisting persists, yet the rules have not been updated for over a decade. That is why we are…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 196 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Sixteenth sitting) “This is a large group of measures, comprising clauses 54, 55 and 56 and new clauses 32, 33 and 43. Clause 54 seeks to repeal sections 2 and 3 of the Trade Union Act 2016 by amending section 226 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 to reverse the changes made by sections 2 and 3 of the 2016 A…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 123 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Sixteenth sitting) “The shadow Minister asked why we cannot support new clauses 32 and 33. The simple answer is that there are already legislative protections in section 54(12) of the Employment Relations Act 2004, which sets out the conditions that must be adhered to in order to ensure that balloting is done in a secure and safe manner. …” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 502 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Sixteenth sitting) “As the shadow Minister eloquently set out, amendment 167 seeks to increase from seven to 21 days the notice that a trade union must give an employer of industrial action after it has secured a ballot mandate and before any such action is taken. As we know, the Trade Union Act 2016 brought in a requirement for unions to…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 405 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “We have had a good debate on the amendment. It is fair to say there is a deep divide in our positions. I will address the amendment and the clause stand part debate. Amendment 126 would make two changes to clause 48. First, it seeks to retain the requirement on trade unions to provide their members with an annual notic…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 433 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Sixteenth sitting) “I will not detain the Committee long, because we have kind of had the debate already. Clause 57 seeks to repeal section 8 of the Trade Union Act 2016 by amending section 234A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. This will revert the notice period that trade unions need to provide, after sec…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 138 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Sixteenth sitting) “The clause seeks to reverse the effect of section 10 of the Trade Union Act 2016, thereby removing the requirement under section 220A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for trade unions to appoint a picket supervisor and to meet other bureaucratic and administrative burdens in relation to …” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 233 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Sixteenth sitting) “Our view was that the legislation was not required when it was introduced in 2016. There was no evidence at the time that there were issues with picketing, and there was already a code of practice in place to deal with abuse and intimidation on picket lines. Therefore, we believe that reverting to the pre-2016 position…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 144 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Fifteenth sitting) “I beg to move amendment 82, in clause 46, page 57, line 37, at end insert— “(c) dismiss the appeal.” This amendment would clarify that the Employment Appeal Tribunal may dismiss an appeal under new section 70ZK(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The amendment is straightforward, provid…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 85 |
| 7 Jan 2025 | Employment Rights Bill (Sixteenth sitting) “I think it would be helpful if I set out why we are seeking to address the issue of detriment within the Bill. The reason is that new section 236A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 is required because of the Supreme Court’s ruling in April 2024 that section 146 of the 1992 Act is incompat…” labour-marketeconomy-jobs | 482 |