Speeches by Baldwin.
Every Hansard contribution by Harriett Baldwin this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 661–680 of 1,151 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting) “As the Committee reaches its clause 4 moment, Members might be pleased to hear that I will not propose voting against it—[Hon. Members: “Oh!”] I know: a political conversion. I accept that in exceptional times, and unfortunately we have seen a few of those in recent years, the Government need these emergency powers. I …” economy-jobstechnology | 230 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting) “Ms Vaz, you will not be surprised to hear that this dystopian picture of unnamed relevant authorities sweeping the land with their powers of seizure, fining and imprisonment is not something that we support, and we therefore oppose clause 3. Question put, That the clause stand part of the Bill.” economy-jobstechnology | 50 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting) “Sadly, I have not seen “Capricorn One”. I have already said clearly, on the record, that I have great confidence in the good intentions of the Minister himself and his Secretary of State. However, that is not to say that we should put powers on the statue book that would allow future occupiers of the position to send s…” economy-jobstechnology | 91 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting) “I beg to move amendment 26, in clause 3, page 5, line 16, leave out subsections (9) to (11). Clause 3 continues to become even more dystopian. In the debate on clause 1, we acknowledged that we have an extremely benign Minister and Secretary of State, and we all acknowledge that products reach the UK marketplace that s…” economy-jobstechnology | 554 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting) “I am not sure that I have heard enough to reassure the Opposition on the subject of who will be a relevant authority, which specific functions will be conferred on that relevant authority and the powers that might be granted to it, so I would like to press the amendments to a vote. Question put, That the amendment be m…” economy-jobstechnology | 60 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting) “If I understand the Minister correctly, he is saying that “relevant authority” is strictly limited to the organisations that he has already mentioned.” economy-jobstechnology | 23 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting) “I would like to respond before I divide the Committee on this amendment. I seek your advice, Ms Vaz. The previous group contained amendments 21, 5 and 7, which relate to clause 2, and we may also want to get the Committee’s point of view on them. The Minister’s reluctance to make this innocuous change to the Bill speak…” economy-jobstechnology | 180 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] (Second sitting) “I beg to move amendment 20, in clause 2, page 3, line 41, leave out “EU” and insert “foreign”.” economy-jobstechnology | 19 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “It is important to highlight the excluded products in the schedule. The powers that the Committee has just agreed to give to the Secretary of State will not cover food, plants, animal by-products, products of animal origin, aircraft, components of aircraft and radio equipment. Importantly, “unmanned aircraft designed o…” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 238 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “Well, Sir John, I do have a very noisy fridge, but I am not sure it is helping me to order the milk. The crucial thing about amendment 17 is that it focuses on innovation. I appreciate that the Government Benches are not necessarily always as heavily weighted with those who have run or developed businesses themselves a…” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 282 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “I beg to move amendment 17, in clause 1, page 1, line 21, at end insert— “(4A) The Secretary of State must also by regulations make provision aimed at promoting investment, fostering innovation, and encouraging economic growth in relation to the marketing or use of products in the United Kingdom. (4B) Regulations under…” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 279 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “In the light of your guidance, Sir John, I would like to divide the Committee on all our amendments in this group.” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 22 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “It is accepted in the impact statement that that is one potential use of the powers, but if the Minister believes that, he will want to support our amendments in this group. Sir John, I understand that because amendment 14 fell, we were unable to divide on subsequent amendments in the first group. In this group, howeve…” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 88 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “We did not hear anything from the Minister to reassure the Committee on the fundamental points that we have been making throughout the debate. The Bill gives unfettered powers to the Secretary of State, and it is openly acknowledged, both in the Bill and in the impact assessment, that the powers could be used to dynami…” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 180 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “We tabled our amendments to clauses 1 and 2 because we can see both what the Secretary of State intends and the purpose of the huge powers he is taking under clause 1. Amendment 3 seeks to remove clause 1(2), which states: “The Secretary of State…in relation to the marketing or use of products in the United Kingdom” ca…” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 404 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “I beg to move amendment 3, in clause 1, page 1, line 9, leave out subsection (2). This amendment removes the Secretary of State’s ability to make regulations about the marketing or use of products in the United Kingdom which corresponds, or is similar to, a provision of relevant EU law for the purpose of reducing or mi…” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 63 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “I listened carefully to the Minister. If I heard him correctly, he basically said that these kinds of skeleton Bills exist, and therefore, despite the objections of his Secretary of State in the last Parliament, he will persist in supporting legislation that continues this practice, which has been so soundly described …” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 77 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “The Minister refers to the Government’s decision to pursue so many skeleton powers in the Bill, and says the Secretary of State now disagrees with what he said back in 2018. Can the Minister elaborate on what has happened in the real world to cause the Secretary of State to have such a damascene conversion?” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 55 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “What a great pleasure it is to serve under your chairmanship this morning, Sir John, and for the duration of this Bill Committee. I am shall start by indulging the Committee with a little bit of background on the reasons behind the amendments in this group. As colleagues will have noted, the Bill gives sweeping powers …” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 1,447 |
| 12 May 2025 | Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting) “I beg to move amendment 14, in clause 1, page 1, line 3, leave out subsection (1). This amendment seeks to remove the broad powers granted to the Secretary of State under product regulations, when defining and regulating risks and determining what constitutes efficient or effective product operation.” economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy | 48 |