Speeches by Stafford.
Every Hansard contribution by Gregory Stafford this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 101–120 of 873 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 2026 | Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1695) “Moving on—this is adjacent, in terms of access—during covid, we obviously set up vaccination centres absolutely everywhere: in schools, playgrounds, parks, car parks, buses and so on. Is that a model that could be used for delivering annual winter vaccinations? I am not talking about regular vaccines, but when we have …” | 82 |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1695) “Forgive me, Dr Kasstan-Dabush, I was expecting you to talk to me about your evidence to the covid-19 inquiry, where essentially you said that the vaccine rollout via outreach clinics would address inequalities of access. I seem to remember that was your evidence. Are you rolling back on that?” | 49 |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1695) “I will press you on that slightly. Okay, I can see the argument for not necessarily having a pop-up in a car park, but is there not something about trying to get the vaccine programme as close to those people who are going to need it, especially in underserved areas? I am not trying to invent something, but could a bus…” | 107 |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1695) “What would you like to see that would enable community pharmacies to expand and be able to deliver more of a vaccine programme?” | 23 |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1695) “Greg, I will come to you in a second. Fin, do you have any reflections on what has happened this winter in terms of vaccinations, from your point of view?” | 30 |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1695) “No, you do not have to be polite.” | 8 |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1695) “If someone had a magic wand or a bucketload of money, neither of which is true, but just imagine if it were—” | 22 |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1695) “Whose responsibility—I will not go as far as saying blame—was it that this information was not there? Is it NHS England? Is it the Department of Health and Social Care? Is it Ministers? Who needs to make that decision? Who needs to take responsibility for that?” | 46 |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-10) “Thank you very much.” | 4 |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-10) “I am happy to, although I do not know the exact titles of their debates. I am really keen to get into the contract and how we deal with that. If that is part of their debates, I would be happy to amalgamate. But I think this would be such a well-attended debate on dentistry. It depends on their angle and what exactly t…” | 97 |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-10) “I have taken a note of them, so I will speak to them as well. Helen Hayes made representations.” | 19 |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-10) “Thank you very much, Chair, and Committee. Thank you for hearing this application. On the key things, I would be very surprised if any member of the Committee, or indeed any Member of the House, did not have a postbag full of issues about access to dentistry. Dentistry is different. Unlike the rest of the NHS, first, a…” | 268 |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-10) “Yes, and that is why—don’t get me wrong; I would love to have this on the main Floor of the Chamber—given the panoply of stuff that you have, I would rather do this sooner. The general debate in Westminster Hall would be, “That this House has considered dentistry provision in England.”” | 51 |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-10) “I am happy to go for a general title, if necessary.” | 11 |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Backbench Business Committee — Oral Evidence (2026-02-10) “I am keen for it to happen as soon as possible, and therefore I am happy to amend the title to something more generic if required.” | 26 |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Energy Infrastructure Technology: Chinese Imports “17. What assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of energy infrastructure-related technologies imported from China on security.” energydefencetechnology | 20 |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Energy Infrastructure Technology: Chinese Imports “Given reports from Norway and Denmark that Chinese-manufactured electric buses contain remote kill switch technology, and that the recent UK-China engagement appears to have delivered an embassy for the Chinese and little more than a Labubu for the United Kingdom, how can the Minister be confident that Chinese-made ene…” energydefencetechnology | 69 |
| 9 Feb 2026 | Standards in Public Life “Let me go back to the process that the Prime Minister followed. He received information from the vetting and security services that Peter Mandelson might have had an ongoing relationship. He then questioned Peter Mandelson about that. Did he then test the answers that Peter Mandelson gave with the vetting and security …” mp-performancecrimeother | 87 |
| 4 Feb 2026 | Health and Social Care Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1612) “I know you do that deliberately. That was a successful pilot because of the force of personality of Professor Tim Briggs and—I would say—the forward looking of the then Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, to get that. My point is not to make a political point. It is to simply say that, in many cases, if not all cases, it is…” | 108 |
| 4 Feb 2026 | Lord Mandelson “I thank the hon. Member for the tone of his speech. I agree with him about the need to use moderate language and be representatives of our constituents, but in addition to that, we are elected to this place—I would hope—because of our judgment and the trust of our electorate. Whatever the outcome of this debate and of …” mp-performancedefenceother | 122 |