The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 873 contributions

Speeches by Stafford.

Every Hansard contribution by Gregory Stafford this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 441460 of 873 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 23 of 44Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I thank the hon. Member for her helpful intervention. If that is correct, I will draw my comments on that point to a close. Amendment 6 concerns CETR frequency. It seeks to change the timetabling of these reviews. The same issues, both positive and negative, run through it as in amendment 3. Amendment 7 would strengthe

healthsocial-carelocal-government
345
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

My hon. Friend attributes to me a level of clairvoyance that I do not possess, but I am sure that the hon. Member for Winchester or the hon. Member for Guildford will pick up that point. The resource implications are not just about the funding. They are about increased workload and the pressure put on the professions a

healthsocial-carelocal-government
120
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

My hon. Friend is entirely correct. We operate in a resource-confined area. It does not matter what the resource envelope is; it will always be confined. If we use resource to service the very laudable aims of the amendment, it will take resource and money away from another area.

healthsocial-carelocal-government
49
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I knew it began with S and was somewhere that is not Surrey or Hampshire—because where else would you want to be, Mr Vickers? The amendment would potentially increase the workload, because more frequent reviews place additional pressure on professionals and services.

healthsocial-carelocal-government
42
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

My hon. Friend makes a key point that I was about to address. Clearly, where there is a supportive family structure with the best interests of the individual at heart, the amendment will work extraordinarily well. However, we have to be realistic about the practical implications. Not every patient has a strong family s

healthsocial-carelocal-government
208
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I agree entirely. That could be the unintended consequence of amendment 51: in essence, if the housing provision is not there, discharge will be delayed. From my understanding of the amendments in the group, those who tabled them are trying to speed up and improve discharge. My hon. Friend is absolutely right that we n

healthsocial-carelocal-government
419
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I agree. Even if the Government build the number of houses that they propose—I have some scepticism—there will always be the potential conflict or disagreement on prioritisation in the housing register and list. As my hon. Friend says, that might well lead to local authorities having to change their criteria, which are

healthsocial-carelocal-government
241
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Vickers. As I have indicated, I have a lot of sympathy with the amendments, but some practical constraints need to be teased out. Amendment 1 seeks to ensure that housing needs are explicitly considered during a care, education and treatment review meeting. I can se

healthsocial-carelocal-government
290
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

Moving on from the confidentiality point, if there is going to be sharing—again, I have a lot of sympathy with the amendments—how would the hon. Lady ensure that disagreements between family members and the patient are safeguarded against?

healthsocial-carelocal-government
38
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I have a lot of sympathy with what the hon. Lady is trying to achieve with these amendments. My question is about how she would ensure, within the context of the provisions, that the patient’s confidentiality would be maintained where it needed to be.

healthsocial-carelocal-government
44
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

On the point made by the hon. Member for Ashford about local authorities, given that the Government are devolving and reorganising local government structures across parts of the country, how will the Minister ensure that the standards around this issue—and other health and social care issues—are maintained? That restr

healthsocial-carelocal-government
72
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (First sitting)

I support the comments of the Minister and the hon. Member for Winchester on the issue. On a cross-party basis, I know that my right hon. Friend the Member for Godalming and Ash (Sir Jeremy Hunt) has taken a close interest. Could he also be included in those discussions?

healthsocial-carelocal-government
49
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

Just in case my hon. Friend the Member for Runnymede and Weybridge is not following this Bill in Hansard, I will pass on the hon. Lady’s compliments to him. Like her, I have great respect for him; I am not trying to denigrate his great work on the amendments and the new clause. All I am suggesting is that, from a laype

healthsocial-carehousing
116
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I am doing my best—I will get it right by week three, I promise. New clause 24 would allow people who have attended or been brought to hospital to seek help or admission as a patient to pursue an application for admission under the Mental Health Act. As other Members have mentioned, section 5(1) of the Mental Health Ac

healthsocial-carehousing
316
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I rise to speak to amendments 52 and 53, tabled by my hon. Friend the Member for Runnymede and Weybridge and moved by my hon. Friend the Member for Solihull West and Shirley. Clearly, both my hon. Friends have significant clinical experience, and I bow in many ways to their expertise. However, the amendments cause me s

healthsocial-carehousing
512
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

I am interested in the points that my hon. Friend is raising. Could he give any examples of the situations he is talking about? It would help the Committee, and certainly help me, to understand the practical realities of what he is talking about.

healthsocial-carehousing
44
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

The Chair said that we must be back here at 20 minutes to 6, and that the Committee would be suspended until that point. We have not been suspended since then.

healthsocial-carehousing
31
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

Ms Furniss, your ruling, as I am sure Hansard will show, is that we were required to come back at 20 minutes to 6. Opposition members of the Committee were back at 20 minutes to 6, and few others were here. You did not suspend the Committee again when the House divided on Third Reading because you were not here, and th

healthsocial-carehousing
67
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

On a point of order, Ms Furniss. I called for a Division on the Adjournment before several members of the Committee who are now in the room came back. What is your ruling on whether members who were not here when the Division was called will be allowed to vote?

healthsocial-carehousing
50
9 Jun 2025Mental Health Bill [ Lords ] (Second sitting)

That is not true. Any member of the Committee can move the Adjournment.

healthsocial-carehousing
13
← PreviousPage 23 of 44 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.