Speeches by Robinson.
Every Hansard contribution by Gavin Robinson this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 641–660 of 919 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 491) “Lord Murphy’s review is looking at some of the practical outworkings of these mechanisms. The impediments that have come up thus far include a lack of political will on the Committee to explore individual issues in depth, which seems to be borne out of whether you are pro or anti-EU, so there is no effective scrutiny o…” | 138 |
| 30 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 491) “Lisa, have you had an opportunity to consider the Government’s response to the notification of the pulling of the Stormont brake? What does that say or point to in relation to EU alignment and the Government’s intentions in that regard?” | 40 |
| 30 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 491) “I think they are hellbent on as much alignment as they can get for the entirety of the country, and that is their political raison d’être. You mentioned the response to the Stormont brake being pulled, and the Government's response highlights one of the deficits. The brake was pulled because the Chemical Industries Ass…” | 215 |
| 30 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 491) “Thank you. Joël, do you have reflections on that discussion about the frailties of the process? Last Thursday, the Government decided to add three new chapters on critical minerals and tariffs emerging from Ukraine and Moldova. They did that without seeking an applicability motion from the Northern Ireland Assembly. So…” | 70 |
| 30 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 491) “On Moldova and Ukraine, there was a tariff agreement that was almost a reiteration of a pre-existing agreement, save that we are now incorporated in EU quotas, which was not the case before. Somebody might say that was inconsequential and that it was almost a roll-over, but is it not the case that this UK Government ar…” | 102 |
| 30 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 491) “They clearly don’t.” | 3 |
| 30 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 491) “No.” | 1 |
| 28 Apr 2025 | Irish Republican Alleged Incitement “indicated dissent.” crimemp-performanceculture-community | 2 |
| 28 Apr 2025 | Irish Republican Alleged Incitement “May I thank the hon. Member for North Durham (Luke Akehurst) for making that reference? Although it is natural that we refer to Jo Cox and Sir David Amess, it is important for Members of this House to recognise that there are also four plaques in this Chamber for Ian Gow, Airey Neave, Robert Bradford and Sir Anthony Be…” crimemp-performanceculture-community | 206 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “Thank you. Baroness O’Loan, you have experience of this in many regards—with Police Ombudsman work and with the steering group of Operation Kenova and others. Do you feel that there is an appropriate way in which the NIO should approach the financing of these investigations? Baroness O’Loan: I think there is a way that…” | 125 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “Rather than consider this in the round and talk about the potential back and forth between the Executive, the NIO and your own budget, this is an opportunity for us as a Committee to have this inquiry and make recommendations to Government. I would ask for a PSNI response, and then perhaps Baroness O’Loan and Sir Iain,…” | 90 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “Good morning, everyone. Chief Constable, I think it is fair to say that you have been brutally but appropriately frank about the financial situation that the PSNI finds itself in. One of your predecessors lamented the fact that the police are spending so much time policing the past, and that is having a fundamental imp…” | 85 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “I think all that is accepted. Baroness O’Loan: I just wanted to make the point.” | 15 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “But from the perspective of somebody who is in a position, it is not an academic discussion; it is a live, real discussion.” | 23 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “The bias, in my view, should be challenged.” | 8 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “Baroness O’Loan? Baroness O’Loan: Thank you, Mr Robinson; I am just looking back at my evidence to you. I think I gave evidence to the effect that those who had held very high office in the RUC, PSNI, armed forces, Ministry of Defence, GCHQ or security services should be excluded from any senior role in the legacy body…” | 255 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “This is an interesting conversation in an academic sense, but we are not in an academic phase of this discussion. There are individuals in senior positions who have a past, and that is why I find some of this so repugnant. It all seems very personal and counterproductive to the pursuit of a settlement on legacy. Barone…” | 197 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “Sir Iain, do you have any brief comments to make on the financing of legacy or do you concur with what has been said?” | 24 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “Baroness O’Loan, you mentioned in response to Ms Hanna the political and jurisdictional difficulties around the Omagh inquiry, in particular. We are aware that a memorandum of understanding was published within the last fortnight between the Omagh inquiry itself—its chairman—and the Irish Government. Have you read that…” | 47 |
| 23 Apr 2025 | Northern Ireland Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 586) “I think you are right to mention that they will have to legislate on the provision of intelligence information. As it stands, the memorandum of understanding is in line with the terms of reference of the Omagh inquiry, which is to assess whether the UK authorities could have prevented the atrocity. There is no introspe…” | 496 |