Speeches by Twigg.
Every Hansard contribution by Derek Twigg this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 321–340 of 580 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “So will there be a surplus?” | 6 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “All right.” | 2 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “So at the moment we do not have a plan for reaching that figure.” | 14 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “At the moment, for instance, Australia are on for about 90, aren’t they?” | 13 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “So we do not have a date for when we will have all 138.” | 14 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “We go back to the figure of 138 that you hope to buy by the end of the decade—” | 19 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “Secretary of State, I was talking about the work share in terms of the As and Bs, and how it will be less on the As. Can you say something about that? Obviously, we want to give as much work as we can to our industry.” | 46 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “Isn’t it the case that the work share for the UK on the F-35As is less than on the F-35Bs? [Interruption.]” | 21 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “When will we have purchased the 138?” | 7 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “So that is still the plan, is it? And when do you expect that to—” | 15 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “Is it still the plan to purchase a total of 138 F-35s, and can we expect the F-35A to make up the greater proportion of that purchase?” | 27 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “Secretary of State, the purchase of the F-35A represents a change in the UK’s nuclear posture. The use of that deterrent will require US backing. Why have the Government decided to pursue this approach rather than a new sovereign nuclear capability?” | 41 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “Sorry, mine is not a productive argument?” | 7 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “You say “watch this space”, but at what point will we possibly get this information?” | 15 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “Just “the autumn”?” | 3 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “What information will we be given as a Committee?” | 9 |
| 2 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 973) “You said it will be in the autumn. What information will the Committee be able to have in the autumn that we have not been allowed to date? Compared with ’23, what will be different about the information that the Committee has access to in the autumn, in terms of transparency?” | 51 |
| 1 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 520) “What should they be? Have you got any idea?” | 9 |
| 1 Jul 2025 | Defence Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 520) “The SDR said we should be looking at new funding models and that that should be explored to see whether we could get more capital into defence. What is your view on that?” | 33 |
| 29 Jun 2025 | Welfare Reform “We already know that the Bill as published was flawed, because of the changes that have been made in the past few days and announced today. I welcome the wider review of PIP and the consultation with disabled people, their organisations and clinicians, but given the wider review and that the Timms review is yet to repo…” economy-jobssocial-carelabour-market | 65 |