The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 860 contributions

Speeches by Kruger.

Every Hansard contribution by Danny Kruger this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 381400 of 860 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 20 of 43Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I think this is important. Those roles are what those judges do in their spare time—they could also chair a football club or something as well. The point is that they are being asked here to fulfil a function on behalf of the Government in their working hours, explicitly because they are a judge—yet they are not sittin

healthsocial-care
71
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right. If Parliament decides that we should proceed, then we should, and the public sector will be obliged to make accommodation and provide the necessary resources. Does he agree that, on that basis, it would be appropriate for the Government to have clarified by this stage what the

healthsocial-care
87
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I look forward to hearing the hon. Member’s substantive remarks, but in explanation I should say that there are no safeguards that I think will make an assisted dying Bill adequate. I will oppose the Bill whatever happens because I think it would be dangerous for people however we do it. But if we are going to do it, l

healthsocial-care
182
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

Let us not rehash the argument about whether there is a difference between withdrawing treatment and actively killing somebody or giving them the opportunity to kill themselves. On the point about withdrawal of treatment, does the hon. Member acknowledge that when there is dispute over whether somebody should have thei

healthsocial-care
96
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

The hon. Gentleman is making an important point and I completely agree. Does he agree that the hon. Member for Spen Valley recognised the problems with the lack of a multidisciplinary team in the process and the problems of court capacity, and through her attempt to address both those problems we now have a multidiscip

healthsocial-care
103
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I just want to support the hon. Member for Bradford West. She is absolutely right. It is clearly intended that there should be a unanimous decision but, in fact, as the hon. Lady pointed out, if one of the members decides effectively to abstain, the procedure does go ahead. It is not that they all have to actively supp

healthsocial-care
87
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I appreciate that an impact assessment is due to come later, after we have debated whether we should have this system or not. Nevertheless, will the Minister tell the Committee whether officials in her Department or in the Department of Health and Social Care have informed the hon. Member for Spen Valley whether the wo

healthsocial-care
170
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I am sorry to report that my mother could not hear a word of the proceedings. I am exaggerating, but she grumbled about the mumbling, which is a lesson for us all.

healthsocial-care
32
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I am happy to acknowledge that there are many other components of the Bill, but many Members, including the hon. Lady, cited this safeguard as an essential element of the safeguarding regime—if not the most essential. Crucially, it was presented to the House of Commons as such, and it is a central clause of the Bill, a

healthsocial-care
126
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I certainly do. That is exactly the scenario that I fear, and I fear it within the NHS too. Let us not imagine that every NHS doctor has all the time and the access to the wider specialisms that they would wish. Under the Bill in its current form, there will be a very strong incentive and a very strong personal instinc

healthsocial-care
342
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I would be grateful for the Minister’s advice on whether she thinks a family member will always have standing. I appreciate her point that it will be for the panel to consider, but is it her view that in law, as in our experience, family members, in the normal understanding of the term—again, we are conscious of the de

healthsocial-care
88
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

To be clear, I was not suggesting that they all said so on Second Reading, because not everybody spoke in that debate—nor am I saying that it is only because of this safeguard that MPs voted for the Bill, but there are 60 colleagues of ours who have cited the judicial safeguard as a reason for supporting the Bill. Inde

healthsocial-care
237
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

This is a very helpful exchange, for which I am grateful to my hon. Friend. In response to the hon. Member for Rother Valley, does my hon. Friend agree that although there should be an obligation to help the decision maker to conclude as to whether the eligibility criteria have been properly met, there is no best-inter

healthsocial-care
116
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

Yes, a number are neutral. I will be grateful if the hon. Lady can tell the Committee if there are any representative bodies working with the professionals who administer end-of-life care that have endorsed either the Bill as it was or the Bill as it is. I do not believe there are.

healthsocial-care
52
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

It was helpful to hear the Bill’s promoter suggest that the system will be inquisitorial—that is not sufficiently apparent in the new clause, as my hon. Friend the Member for Reigate says. Does she agree that the panel must therefore have proper inquisitorial powers and authority? At the moment, there is a lack of genu

healthsocial-care
78
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I appreciate the Minister’s point about the Parole Board. Does she acknowledge that in the Parole Board example there is the essence of an adversarial system, because the victim is invited to give a statement? The board therefore hears opinions from, as it were, both sides of the case. Who will fulfil that second role

healthsocial-care
61
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-second sitting)

I was not suggesting that the hon. Gentleman opposed the panel. I recognise that he is speaking in support of it. My concern was that he was suggesting that there was a problem with the High Court stage. I now appreciate that he is objecting to some sort of fourth stage that some people might be suggesting on top of th

healthsocial-care
91
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

Yes; it would be inappropriate to ask a panel to operate in an adversarial system. It would be inappropriate to ask a psychiatrist and a social worker to act as a judge. We need a proper court system, as we always do with other important decisions in which two sides make arguments. Let me try to explain. I agree that w

healthsocial-care
358
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

I greatly respect the position that the hon. Lady has come to. She has been persuaded that this is an improvement on the Bill, and I respect that. I recognise that that is what the hon. Member for Spen Valley and others think, but I am afraid I do not accept that the process has been adequate. The hon. Member for Penis

healthsocial-care
172
12 Mar 2025Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Twenty-third sitting)

The hon. Lady must not apologise for intervening on me. I can hardly be one to object to people intervening. This is a very good forum for the kind of exchanges we are having, so I am very happy to take interventions. She is absolutely right that lots of evidence has been presented. I cite it myself all the time. Furth

healthsocial-care
118
← PreviousPage 20 of 43 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.