Speeches by Young.
Every Hansard contribution by Claire Young this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 461–480 of 1,092 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “Before we move on to our questions about habitats and environmental impact assessment, I want to ask Rebecca this: is there anything you think can be done? To go back to the question I asked about where sites are close together, where you may be able to do something and gain added benefit, is there any way that can be …” | 65 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “Should the presence of a nuclear power station affect future housing development within its population density buffer? And how should the policy interact with housing targets and the Government’s planning reforms?” | 31 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “Currently the HSE carries out the semi-urban criterion tests, but if asked, will the ONR review the methodology?” | 18 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “As the Member representing Oldbury, I feel obliged to say that the community there has missed out as well, because it was involved in the STEP fusion bidding process and narrowly missed out. However, I want to pick up on something that Alastair said about Berkeley. Part of that STEP fusion proposal, and more recently o…” | 158 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “Mike, could you clarify how the ONR approaches emergency planning and how requirements in site licensing interact with planning policy tools?” | 21 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “How do you respond to the suggestion that we take the Finnish approach?” | 13 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “I asked the last panel about the semi-urban population density criteria that the Government retained in EN-7, but which they have said they are open to revisiting. Is the Government’s regulatory taskforce right that EN-7 misses an opportunity to re-examine SUPDC?” | 41 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “The Committee is concerned that we have heard evidence that environmental mitigations are not being delivered. How do you ensure that they are, and that it is done in an enforceable and transparent way?” | 34 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “It is an acoustic deterrent. I appreciate that.” | 8 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “We saw at Hinkley that they tried to get out of the so-called “fish disco”. They ended up proposing saltmarshes many miles away from their original site—one of them in my patch. Is it acceptable to do something so far off site? What is being done to ensure that developers actually stick to what they agreed to in the fi…” | 61 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “Julia?” | 1 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “So is the manufacturer saying, “This is what we think the exclusion zones need to be,” and then the regulator is checking that?” | 23 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “On the Finnish one, it sounds like the manufacturers are setting their own requirements. What sort of outside checking is done?” | 21 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “Okay. Do you think there could be an alternative test that might ensure public safety and maintain confidence? For example, the REPPIR are already site-specific and proportionate. Some people have suggested that a simple fix would be to scrap the SUPDC and simply fold REPPIR requirements into the national policy statem…” | 52 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “Okay. Is it accurate to say that the SUPDC assessments by the Health and Safety Executive are slow and complex? We will start with Tom.” | 25 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “Julia, do you have anything to add?” | 7 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “Do you think there still needs to be some measure of excluding it from built-up areas though, given that there is always some radiological risk?” | 25 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Energy Security and Net Zero Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1212) “EN–7 retains the Semi Urban Population Density Criterion, but evidence we have taken from the industry calls it outdated and a barrier to new nuclear. Should it be kept, removed or updated? I will start with Julia.” | 37 |
| 8 Sept 2025 | Critical Infrastructure Funding: Maintenance and Repair “1. How much capital funding she plans to allocate for the maintenance and repair of critical infrastructure in the next five years.” transportfiscal-policyeconomy-jobs | 22 |
| 8 Sept 2025 | Hydrogen Supply Chains “It is an honour to serve under your chairship, Mr Betts. I thank the hon. Member for Rushcliffe (James Naish) for securing the debate, and his able substitute, the hon. Member for Worcester (Tom Collins), for opening it. With good access to offshore wind resources, the UK is ideally placed to scale up green hydrogen pr…” energyeconomy-jobsenvironment | 368 |