The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 654 contributions

Speeches by Murray.

Every Hansard contribution by Chris Murray this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 6180 of 654 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 4 of 33Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

There has been a lot of discussion around the French changing their maritime law in response to the taxi boats phenomenon and the appalling fact that last year 14 people drowned in the channel, including in November a one-month-old child. What have your discussions been like with the French, and what is the progress on

73
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

You have announced the creation of new safe routes, which many people have called for over a very period. Can you tell us what kind of number of people you would like to see coming through on safe routes? What impact, if any at all, will that have on the small boat crossings?

53
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

That is very interesting; thank you. You say that the proof of concept has been established and that does send a signal to people. The question is, how is that signal transmitted? We visited northern France as a Committee and spoke to the French law enforcement officers there and UK law enforcement. Are we able to get

104
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

Thank you for that. I would like to move on to now talk about asylum accommodation. This Committee has heard a lot of evidence, which is blood-boiling, of billions of pounds being wasted, in a way that is terrible for communities where hotels pop up and terrible for the asylum seekers themselves—we heard about really s

116
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

That’s an understatement.

3
4 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 505)

You have projected savings of £1.1 billion on asylum accommodation by 2029. That is a huge amount of money. Are you on track to make that saving?

27
3 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1409)

I understand the logic of your point there but do you think that it is within the wit of the Home Office or any Government Department to design a system that could be that tailored or what do you think would be a good proxy to use? If not your salary, if not the employer, unless you go out and do a job analysis of ever

77
3 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1409)

That was going to be exactly my question back to you, which is what adjustments would you want to see made for the system to work like that?

28
3 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1409)

That brings me on to my next question, which is I accept your argument that if you only look at income to speed you up through the settlement process then that would be very crude but from what I understand in the consultation it is just adding that in as another element, so it is multiple things you could do to speed

116
3 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1409)

It is not banning people who do not meet the fiscal cost from getting it; it is just extending the time period.

22
3 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1409)

What about the argument that this is about basically fiscal cost, so some people come into the country to do jobs and do it perfectly legally and that is great but there is a point at which you pay in more than you have taken out to the Exchequer and if you are at that level then that is great, you can apply for settle

121
3 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1409)

The consultation does involve other metrics as well such as volunteerism but I am asking specifically about the salary thresholds and working in the public sector.

26
3 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1409)

I want to broaden out a bit to look at the routes to settlement not in the care sector but across the whole local economy. One of the proposals in the consultation is for deductions and the time it takes to get to the route to settlement based on whether your salary is above a threshold, to a threshold, that would spee

111
3 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1409)

I will follow up on the social care conversation. First, I see in my own constituency and in my personal life the massive contribution of social care workers both UK nationals and foreign nationals and it just cannot be understated. On the topic of why the sector has struggled to recruit domestically, can I put to you

202
3 Feb 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1409)

We get that a lot.

5
28 Jan 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 986)

Finally, what is your view on the use of paper documents? Obviously, quite a lot of smaller businesses and legacy employees will still be using paper. In 2026, does that have a big impact?

34
28 Jan 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 986)

Thank you very much. We have heard that employers often make mistakes or struggle to navigate the system. According to the Home Office, 80% of employers got one compliance question wrong, 81% incorrectly thought that recruitment agencies checked the status of agency workers, and 70% of employers in the construction ind

84
28 Jan 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 986)

That picks up on Jo White’s point earlier, that the advantage of a labour market being very flexible and informal is that you can fill spaces quite easily, and that the labour market can adapt within hours to find pickers. The downside is the vulnerability of it. It is a trade-off between those two. Do you accept that

66
28 Jan 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 986)

I want to ask a bit about the impact that right-to-work checks have. To my mind, there are three categories of people: there are the people who do the right-to-work checks and follow the rules, and that is great; there are the people who try to follow the rules but make mistakes because they are complicated; and there

103
28 Jan 2026Home Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 986)

To open it out to the rest of the panel, what problems do you think employers encounter in fulfilling their legal obligations? Also, what do you think of the argument that the system is focusing on the wrong set of people? A lot of people are following the law and employing people legally, and they put in a lot of effo

132
← PreviousPage 4 of 33 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.