The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 946 contributions

Speeches by Dean.

Every Hansard contribution by Bobby Dean this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 381400 of 946 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 20 of 48Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
14 Oct 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

I can see that Professor Advani wants to come in. What about the other aspect that has been floated: a limit on the amount that you could give away before your death?

32
14 Oct 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

Would extending it from seven years to 10 or 15 years solve that problem, because people would not want to give up their wealth so early?

26
14 Oct 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

I am going to move away from controversial taxes and talk about inheritance tax. On the one hand, we have people saying, “This is outrageous. I pay tax all my life, and then I die and they tax me again,” and on the other hand, other people say, “This is outrageous. Somebody is getting something for nothing. They do not

155
14 Oct 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

The spending review is for everybody but the Treasury—

9
14 Oct 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

Ruth Curtice, did you want to come in on that point?

11
14 Oct 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

It just gets more expensive.

5
14 Oct 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

Can I just push you on one point relating to that? We know that when we speculate about productivity gains that could be earned from activities such as the ones you have just described, the OBR tends not to score them very strongly, because there is a lot of uncertainty there. At the same time, however, the sorts of re

137
14 Oct 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 1349)

We are going to be talking a lot about tax today, but we thought it would also be useful to look briefly at alternatives to tax—whether there is any realistic chance of us getting big boosts to productivity or seeing a large amount of spending cuts. There are obviously lots of ideas out there about whether we can cut t

104
12 Oct 2025Baby Loss

I thank the co-sponsors for securing the debate and for all colleagues’ powerful contributions so far tonight. Many of those contributions have focused on preventable baby loss, calling for lessons to be learnt and for more to be done, which I fully support. However, I would like to take this opportunity to shine a lig

healthsocial-care
721
12 Oct 2025 Security Update: Official Secrets Act Case

I admire the Government’s attempts to pin this on the previous Conservative Government. It is an endeavour in which I would usually join them, but on this occasion I cannot, because the argument simply does not stack up. The argument seems to hinge on the Conservative Government’s classification of China as a threat to

defencemp-performancecrime
190
14 Sept 2025 Official Secrets Act

China has broken international agreements with the UK. It has placed bounties on the heads of Hongkongers seeking refuge in this country. Today’s announcement that charges have been dropped will only embolden China in its efforts to interfere with our democracy. The Minister has mentioned the effectiveness of the forei

defencecrimemp-performance
81
9 Sept 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

We touched last time on market integrity and the potential for firm failure. Most of the fears that there will be widespread firm failure as a result of this have subsided, but there might still be some at the margins. I am not sure whether you are aware of any particularly at-risk firms or not. If that was to happen,

96
9 Sept 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Does that include the report? I believe that the diagnostic report commissioned is quite an expensive one, and it would be quite critical to your understanding of the market. Is that right?

32
9 Sept 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

I have one more point on the construction of the redress scheme. One core principle is about market integrity. I totally understand: we do not want the market to collapse and consumers to lose out as a result. A lot of those big fears have subsided because the fiduciary duty and the bribery claims have gone away. I und

111
9 Sept 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

This is my final question. Whether or not a consumer was aware of the arrangement, whether it was buried in a deep agreement or whether they had the ability to understand the arrangement, that would be case by case. When it comes to the level of commission, it was shockingly high in the case that won in the Supreme Cou

105
9 Sept 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

Would you accept that the person who won the Supreme Court case is not one of those?

17
9 Sept 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

You have engaged with some, but I know that HD Law, for example, which won the Supreme Court case alongside Sentinel, says that it has been trying to make contact with you but has had next to zero engagement with the FCA. It has datasets, which it has shown me, of all the cases that it is running through the court, whi

200
9 Sept 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

I understand that. The reason I am probing is that I have been engaging with some of the more reputable legal firms. They have told me that the vast majority of cases they were pursuing through the courts were on this basis of unfair relationship. They are concerned that overall estimates that have been put out there s

182
9 Sept 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

It sounds like you do not have a firm idea. It is just, at the moment, an estimate based on overall number of cases and your best guess at what proportion of them might fall under this category.

38
9 Sept 2025Treasury Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 417)

As you said, there is clarity between there being a fiduciary duty on the lender, which was dismissed, and there being an unfair relationship. The next question comes on to the extent to which we think the number of cases that were in the system were on this basis of an unfair relationship. There has been an impression

115
← PreviousPage 20 of 48 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.