Speeches by Gardiner.
Every Hansard contribution by Barry Gardiner this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.
Showing 481–500 of 1,426 contributions · most-recent first
| Date | Debate & contribution | Words |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Jul 2025 | Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 831) “Dr Lane, welcome. I am glad that either you or we have at last managed to master the technology and that you have been able to join us remotely. How much of a role does the transport analysis guidance play in guiding the approval of airport expansion?” | 47 |
| 16 Jul 2025 | Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 831) “Minister, I want to turn to the sustainable aviation fuel mandate. By 2040, there will have to be 22% SAF in the mix for aircraft. That is the main obligation. It ramps up to the 2040 level. Can you explain to us what the power-to-liquid obligation is?” | 47 |
| 16 Jul 2025 | Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 831) “In the Gatwick DCO, you found that its assessment of a 3.4% uplift in emissions, which would have been below the material impact level of 5%, was incorrect. The Planning Inspectorate found that the scale of emissions would be such that it was likely to breach the material impact. That relies on you having some fairly s…” | 108 |
| 16 Jul 2025 | Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 831) “It gives you fairly biased information, or at least selective information according to the science that it chooses.” | 18 |
| 16 Jul 2025 | Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 831) “You did not answer the Chair’s question, though, did you? You told him what this month was, but you did not answer his question. Will you publish a full set of the economic data to update it from the 2018 ANPS?” | 41 |
| 16 Jul 2025 | Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 831) “Dr Lane, welcome. I am glad that either you or we have at last managed to master the technology and that you have been able to join us remotely. How much of a role does the transport analysis guidance play in guiding the approval of airport expansion?” | 47 |
| 16 Jul 2025 | Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 831) “Dr Lane, since the ANPS was produced in 2018, we have had major pieces of legislation, such as the Environment Act for one. We have established the Office for Environmental Protection. The whole environmental milieu has changed. That is not reflected in the ANPS, is it? Are you able to take that into account and, as it…” | 67 |
| 16 Jul 2025 | Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 831) “Therefore, it is not able to amend either.” | 8 |
| 16 Jul 2025 | Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 831) “No, it is a straight question. Will you publish that data?” | 11 |
| 16 Jul 2025 | Environmental Audit Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 831) “Yes, the ETS. S&P Global Commodity Insights has looked at the potential constraints on SAF and the potential market. It has said that the number of countries that have proposed or adopted long-term blending targets of sustainable aviation fuels continues to increase. They have done their assessment of that, looking for…” | 103 |
| 15 Jul 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “The KKR bid would have needed creditors to agree to it in a court vote on a restructuring plan. So creditors were effectively negotiating terms here; that is part 26A of the Companies Act 2006. There is clearly a conflict between creditors where they are bidding against other parties, especially where we have a public …” | 75 |
| 15 Jul 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “It said it could not be delivered in a reasonable timeframe and what they believe the public expectation was. So my question to you is, how is it that you believe that this group with no operational expertise can?” | 39 |
| 15 Jul 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “So you accept there was a conflict of interest and the creditors were effectively negotiating terms with KKR?” | 18 |
| 15 Jul 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “Should we actually be talking to Tim Lavelle at Silver Point rather than you?” | 14 |
| 15 Jul 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “That is fascinating, but it is not really an answer to my question. You said that KKR felt that it could not deliver what the public’s expectations were in a reasonable turnaround time. Yet you have told this Committee that KKR’s bid was a world-class bid with the expertise to do just that. You now seem to be favouring…” | 106 |
| 15 Jul 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “Are they going to do it if KKR could not?” | 10 |
| 15 Jul 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “And they secured their own.” | 5 |
| 15 Jul 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “So were you telling the truth to this Committee when you said that you expected to draw down the second tranche of that loan facility in June?” | 27 |
| 15 Jul 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “It was wrong.” | 3 |
| 15 Jul 2025 | Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee — Oral Evidence (HC 588) “My question is, was it an artificial deadline?” | 8 |