The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 820 contributions

Speeches by Eagle.

Every Hansard contribution by Angela Eagle this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 561580 of 820 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 29 of 41Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

It is a two-limb test. Obviously, the evidential test for criminal proceedings is beyond reasonable doubt. There is a lower evidential test in other court instances, and it may very well be that someone who did not pass the “beyond reasonable doubt” test in a criminal trial would still be considered by the court to be

immigrationcrimedefence
155
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

Currently, the High Court has the authority to impose a serious crime prevention order without a conviction, provided that the Court is satisfied that the person has been involved in serious crime and that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the order will protect the public by preventing, restricting or disru

immigrationcrimedefence
262
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

Three days seems a reasonable amount of time to allow the individual or body corporate concerned to gather the information, but also to ensure that the authorities get it in a timely way, so as to prevent any potential harm that might come from delay. Question put and agreed to. Clause 49 accordingly ordered to stand p

immigrationcrimedefence
83
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

Clause 49 amends the Serious Crime Act 2007 to introduce a standardised list of notification requirements for individuals and bodies corporate that are subject to serious crime prevention orders. This is a process of standardisation. Currently, notification requirements are added at the court’s discretion on a case-by-

immigrationcrimedefence
283
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

The idea behind the creation of interim serious crime prevention orders is to ensure that they can be brought into use ahead of a longer lasting serious crime prevention order. The widening of the range of organisations that can apply for them is designed to empower organisations such as the National Crime Agency, HMRC

immigrationcrimedefence
222
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

Currently, the High Court can make a serious crime prevention order only upon application from the Crown Prosecution Service, the Serious Fraud Office and the police in terrorism-related cases. However, High Court serious crime prevention orders have not been fully utilised; between 2011 and 2021, only two applications

immigrationcrimedefence
305
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

The High Court will be empowered to impose an interim serious crime prevention order if it considers it just to do so. In other words, it is not an evidential test, because the Court does not apply a standard of proof. Rather, it invites the Court to impose an order before it has heard and tested all the evidence in in

immigrationcrimedefence
152
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

Clause 47 introduces interim serious crime prevention orders as part of the wider regime of serious crime prevention orders established under the Serious Crime Act 2007. Interim serious crime prevention orders are designed to protect the public while a full serious crime prevention order application is considered. The

immigrationcrimedefence
97
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Seventh sitting)

First things first: the hon. Gentleman was not going to send to Rwanda only those whom we could not return to their own country; in theory, he was going to deport to Rwanda absolutely everybody who arrived to claim asylum after March 2023—that was what we were told. In reality, those people all ended up in hotels, unab

immigration
212
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

We are talking about electronic monitoring in the context of serious crime prevention orders; we are not talking about monitoring simply in connection to being an asylum seeker or migrant. I would not want Opposition Members to worry or mix up those two things. This part of the Bill is about dealing with serious and or

immigrationcrimedefence
388
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

The purpose of clause 46 is to remove any ambiguity about the court’s power to impose electronic monitoring as a condition of a serious crime prevention order or interim serious crime prevention order. As currently drafted, the clause applies in England and Wales for any serious crime prevention order or interim seriou

immigrationcrimedefence
290
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

Clause 45 amends the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to include offences related to the possession and supply of articles intended for serious crime, as outlined in clause 43. It will enable law enforcement agencies to seize the assets of individuals convicted under clause 43. Specifically, the clause adds: “Offences relati

immigrationcrimedefence
246
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

The clause introduces schedule 1, which will allow the governance arrangements for the Immigration Services Commissioner and deputy commissioner to be made more flexible. That will bring them in line with other public appointments by allowing for interim or shorter appointment lengths. Schedule 1 sets out that the comm

immigrationcrimedefence
231
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

Clauses 43 and 44 cover the creation of two new offences concerning articles for use in serious crime. Law enforcement agencies are increasingly encountering individuals in possession of, or supplying, articles suspected to be intended for serious crime. However, proving intent or knowledge for a prosecution is often d

immigrationcrimedefence
473
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

This is essentially future proofing. If another category or range of people became available, we may future proof this power and use the regulation-making power to ensure that they are taking biometrics lawfully. Question put and agreed to. Clause 42 accordingly ordered to stand part of the Bill. Clause 43 Articles for

immigrationcrimedefence
66
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

You are getting a lot of practice with locking and unlocking the doors and having Divisions, Dame Siobhain—it is quite exciting this afternoon. Clause 42 modernises our powers to capture biometric information, so that we have greater flexibility over who can take that information. It will enable a wider range of approp

immigrationcrimedefence
193
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

I am happy to give the hon. Lady the assurance that she sought. If somebody is going to be detained, it will always be done with written notice, and that should not delay anything—it has not in the past. Question put, That the amendment be made.

immigrationcrimedefence
46
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

The clause seeks to put beyond any doubt that the Home Office has the power to detain, in conducive deportation cases, at the earliest point. It has been doing that for many years. The clarification in the clause applies retrospectively to ensure that those who have been detained in the past have not been detained unla

immigrationcrimedefence
235
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Eighth sitting)

The purpose of clause 41 is to clarify the existing powers of detention pending deportation set out in schedule 3(2) of the Immigration Act 1971. The clause ensures that the Secretary of State can detain individuals once they have been notified that deportation is being considered. It also aligns the power to detain wi

immigrationcrimedefence
529
11 Mar 2025Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill (Seventh sitting)

There will not be a blanket ban. Individuals who have been subject to public order disqualification will have been disqualified for things such as multiple drug offences, possessing a firearm and ammunition, multiple counts of sexual assault and assault by beating, grooming and engaging in sexual communication with a c

immigration
383
← PreviousPage 29 of 41 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.