The Westminster lensArchive · §02 Speeches · 44 contributions

Speeches by Mak.

Every Hansard contribution by Alan Mak this parliament, most recent first. Back to the MP page for the headline figures and analysed positions.

Showing 2140 of 44 contributions · most-recent first

← PreviousPage 2 of 3Next →
DateDebate & contributionWords
12 Feb 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords]

I said to the Minister, and I will say it again for the hon. Lady: it is for the Government to bring forward their proposal. Once the consultation closes, we will respond. That is the proper order in this House.

technologyeconomy-jobs
40
12 Feb 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords]

The Secretary of State keeps asking me questions, but I am not in government. It is for him to answer. It is for him to bring forward a consultation and legislation, and to give certainty to the creative sector. There is no point asking me questions—I am not in government. What I can tell the Secretary of State is that

technologyeconomy-jobs
504
12 Feb 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords]

I was going to say to the hon. Lady, half in jest and half in reality, that the Liberal Democrats will say whatever they need to say in any part of the country and on any issue. That is the reality.

technologyeconomy-jobs
41
12 Feb 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords]

I am not in government, so I will not give way until later—although if the Secretary of State wants to come to the Dispatch Box to explain why his consultation and review are late and why he has not given any certainty to the sector, I am happy to give way, but I do not think he wants to do that. Let us go back to the

technologyeconomy-jobs
75
12 Feb 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords]

The Secretary of State needs to listen to the creative industries sector. So far he has ignored that sector, issued a consultation late and given it no faith whatsoever. The timing of the consultation and the Bill is fully faulty, reflecting Labour’s entirely incoherent approach—[Interruption.] The Government’s consult

technologyeconomy-jobs
116
12 Feb 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords]

I make progress, but I will give way shortly. On the Conservative Benches, we have many well-respected champions of the creative industries sector. I am especially looking forward to the contribution of my right hon. Friend the Member for Maldon, who brings his insight as a former Secretary of State for Culture, Media

technologyeconomy-jobs
173
12 Feb 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords]

The creative industries sector is telling us that that solution is not fit for purpose. We will hold the Labour Government to account because the creative industries are extremely important. Under the Conservatives, we became the second largest exporter of television programming and the fourth largest exporter of film,

technologyeconomy-jobs
60
12 Feb 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords]

The last Conservative Government left Britain with a world-class creative industries sector. It is Labour’s dither and delay that is causing huge anxiety, as I will go on to say. Rather than solving a problem, Labour is the problem. One way to resolve that is to accept the Conservative proposal, tabled in the other pla

technologyeconomy-jobs
156
12 Feb 2025Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords]

The Conservatives want Britain to be a science and technology superpower, and that means fully unlocking all the benefits of data. As a country, we must make the appropriate use of data more widespread. That would cut red tape, make research easier, create new jobs, deliver economic growth and enable people to access p

technologyeconomy-jobs
586
12 Feb 2025Topical Questions

When Labour negotiates, Britain loses. AstraZeneca is investing more than £4 billion in Singapore, the US and Canada. It could have invested in our country too. What is Labour doing to bring back the deal that it destroyed?

technologyeconomy-jobs
38
12 Feb 2025Topical Questions

The Conservatives secured a £450 million investment from AstraZeneca to expand its Merseyside vaccine factory. When the Chancellor wrecked the deal, AstraZeneca tried to save it by increasing that investment to over £500 million. Why did Labour still walk away, handing jobs and investment to our competitors?

technologyeconomy-jobs
47
3 Feb 2025AstraZeneca

Thank you, Mr Speaker, for granting this urgent question. Just five days ago, in another speech about growth designed to divert attention from the total lack of growth caused by Labour’s high taxes and anti-business approach, the Chancellor specifically praised AstraZeneca: she knew that the last Conservative Governmen

economy-jobstechnology
415
3 Feb 2025AstraZeneca

(Urgent Question):To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology if he will make a statement on AstraZeneca.

economy-jobstechnology
20
13 Jan 2025Artificial Intelligence Opportunities Action Plan

I thank the Secretary of State for advance sight of his statement. Let me begin by thanking Matt Clifford for his work. Having known Matt for many years, I am grateful for his long-standing contribution to the tech sector, including with the last Conservative Government. It was that last Conservative Government who ide

economy-jobseducationhealth
753
8 Jan 2025Employer National Insurance Contributions

Thank you, Mr Speaker. “Companies like ours will be less incentivised to grow”. That is the conclusion of Paul Taylor, founder of British tech unicorn Thought Machine, which employs more than 500 people. Britain is now missing out on new jobs and investment as a direct result of Labour’s national insurance jobs tax. Wh

economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy
72
8 Jan 2025Employer National Insurance Contributions

The truth is that the Labour Government are failing our tech workers, because they do not care about our tech sector. Last September, Paul said that he was very keen to list Thought Machine in London instead of New York, and one of his preconditions before listing is being able to grow the business as much as possible.

economy-jobstechnologyfiscal-policy
78
20 Nov 2024Topical Questions

On the Opposition Benches we are proud that it was the last Conservative Government who created the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. I am glad that Labour is following our agenda, and I look forward to my exchanges with the Secretary of State. Under the last Conservative Government, Britain was home t

technologyhealtheducation
115
20 Nov 2024Topical Questions

I thank the Secretary of State for his kind words, but he has punished labour: figures from his own Department show that workers will be losing out by nearly £800 each per year as a result of Labour’s Budget. Will he stand up to the Chancellor and oppose any further tax rises on Britain’s hard-working tech sector?

technologyhealtheducation
57
29 Oct 2024Sustainable Public Finances

Last Wednesday, in Washington, the Chancellor announced changes to the debt rules to allow Labour to borrow more. However, published Treasury advice says that increasing borrowing risks interest rates staying higher for longer. Does the Chancellor agree with her Treasury civil servants?

fiscal-policyhousinglocal-government
42
14 Oct 2024Draft Insurance and Reinsurance Undertakings (Prudential Requirements) (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Regulations 2024

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Dowd. I am pleased to inform the Committee that we intend to support today’s statutory instrument, because it continues the essential reforms to Solvency II started by the previous Conservative Government, as the Minister said, of which I was a member. The financial

economy-jobsfiscal-policytechnology
271
← PreviousPage 2 of 3 · click a debate to open the transcript with this MP’s speeches highlightedNext →
Sources
SourceHansard · official report
MethodEach row is one contribution (intervention or speech). Word count from the official text.