Inquiry · Opened 12 December 2025
Unlocking land for housing
From: Public Accounts Committee
What this inquiry is asking
Can the Government unlock £30.5 billion in housing funding (£10.5 billion legacy plus £20 billion new National Housing Delivery Fund) to meaningfully increase housing supply? The inquiry examines whether MHCLG, Homes England, and mayoral authorities have credible plans, delivery mechanisms, and accountability measures to convert this investment into homes built.
Status / emerging findings
- 57,671 homes reported completed through legacy programmes by December 2025, but the NAO has not yet verified this figure; the Department plans 12-month retrospective verification using geospatial imaging for ~70% of sites lacking formal boundary records.
- The new £20 billion National Housing Delivery Fund launched April 2026 with three equity deals completed and £1.5 billion devolved to mayoral authorities, but no numerical housing targets have been set for the fund.
- Committee pressed witnesses hard on absence of firm milestones and accountability measures; MHCLG explicitly declined to commit to specific housing numbers, citing need for 'flexibility'.
- Tension between reported pipeline activity and lack of binding targets suggests institutional reluctance to face delivery scrutiny.
Why it matters
With £30.5 billion committed to housing delivery, the UK needs confidence this money will translate into homes rather than sitting in pipelines; without firm targets or verified baselines, Parliament cannot hold the Government accountable for results.
Tone arc
Started procedural (reviewing fund deployment mechanics) but became adversarial when committee discovered absence of numerical targets and questioned the robustness of retrospective verification methodology for legacy programme claims.
Themes
Key witnesses
Sarah Healey (MHCLG), Joanna Key (Homes England), Amy Rees (mayoral authority representative), Alison Crofton (mayoral authority representative), Cathy Francis (MHCLG)
Witness sessions
Oral evidence · 21 May 2026
Session 1 of 1
Written evidence & correspondence
Themes & actors
Topics across publication summaries
Top organisations & named entities
- Dame Sarah Healey·1 reference
- Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)·1 reference
- Homes England·1 reference
- National Audit Office (NAO)·1 reference
- Public Accounts Committee·1 reference
- Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown·1 reference
Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗