Inquiry · Opened 21 March 2025
The First 1000 Days: a renewed focus
From: Health and Social Care Committee
What this inquiry is asking
This inquiry examines whether the government is adequately investing in and coordinating early childhood services—family hubs, health visiting, vaccinations, and specialist support—during the critical first 1,000 days from conception to age two. It asks what progress has been made since 2019, whether current funding and workforce plans will close the gap leaving England with some of Europe's worst child health outcomes, and how fragmented services should be integrated.
Status / emerging findings
- Health visitor workforce has collapsed by 43% since 2015 (5,000-post shortfall), with remaining staff managing dangerously high caseloads exceeding 750 children per person
- Government's £500 million commitment for 1,000 family hubs by 2028 falls far short of Barnardo's evidence-based recommendation for 3,500 hubs costing £2.7 billion
- One-third of families with disabled children forced into private treatment due to NHS waiting lists; children wait up to three years for diagnosis in community paediatrics
- Sure Start research proves £2 return per £1 spent with long-term benefits (reduced hospitalisations, better GCSE outcomes), but austerity cuts since 2010 eliminated two-thirds of funding
- Data fragmentation and lack of shared outcomes framework prevent services from identifying and reaching families with greatest need; Core20PLUS5 health inequality initiative lacks comprehensive datasets
Why it matters
England records some of Europe's worst child health outcomes; how well services identify and support infants in their most critical developmental window determines long-term poverty, health, and educational inequality across millions of children.
Tone arc
Inquiry opened cooperatively with Marmot's evidence on health inequalities and austerity's damage, shifted toward critical scrutiny as witnesses revealed waiting-list crises and funding gaps, then became mixed-frustrated when ministerial evidence confirmed the Government's ambitions remain below expert recommendations despite £500 million investment.
Themes
Key witnesses
Professor Sir Michael Marmot (UCL Institute of Health Equity), Barnardo's (early intervention evidence), Institute for Fiscal Studies (Sure Start cost-benefit analysis), NHS England (community paediatrics, waiting times), Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Minister Ashley Dalton (Department of Health and Social Care), Hull City Council (family hub model), Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists
Reports & Government Responses
Report · 22 January 2026 · HC 802
Witness sessions
Oral evidence · 7 May 2025 · HC 802
Session 1 of 4Professor Sir Michael Marmot (UCL Institute of Health Equity)
Oral evidence · 4 June 2025 · HC 802
Session 2 of 4Oral evidence · 2 July 2025 · HC 802
Session 3 of 4Oral evidence · 3 September 2025 · HC 802
Session 4 of 4
Written evidence & correspondence
Correspondence · 28 April 2026
Correspondence from Minister Hodgson - First 1000 Days Response
Correspondence · 15 October 2025
Correspondence from Minister Dalton re First 1000 days evidence session
Engagement document · 5 September 2025
Correspondence · 2 July 2025
Themes & actors
Topics across publication summaries
Top organisations & named entities
- Layla Moran MP·2 references
- Health and Social Care Committee·2 references
- Department of Health and Social Care·2 references
- Minister Dalton·2 references
- Paulette Hamilton MP·2 references
- NHS England·2 references
- Department for Education·2 references
- Sharon Hodgson MP·1 reference
- 1001 Critical Days Foundation·1 reference
- Layla Moran (Health and Social Care Committee Chair)·1 reference
Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗