Inquiry · Opened 26 June 2025

Healthy Ageing: physical activity in an ageing society

From: Health and Social Care Committee

Open2 documents3 evidence sessions

What this inquiry is asking

The Health and Social Care Committee investigated why physical activity is chronically underutilised as a preventive health intervention for older people, despite evidence that modest increases in movement (4,000 steps, 2–3 times weekly) reduce mortality by 26–40%. The inquiry asked: what blocks older people from being active, why isn't the NHS treating physical activity as a clinical priority, and what systemic changes are needed to embed movement into health and social care?

Status / emerging findings

  • Physical activity is treated as an 'optional extra' across NHS and social care despite being 'more effective than many drugs' and among the safest, most cost-effective interventions available.
  • A 20-year gap in healthy life expectancy exists between most and least deprived areas; infrastructure barriers (uneven pavements, lack of rest seats, absent accessible paths) are the primary drivers of inactivity in older people, not motivation.
  • An 'empathy gap' exists: health professionals attribute barriers to cost or willpower, while older and disabled people cite condition-specific obstacles (pain, fatigue, fear of harm) and benefits-system disincentives that punish visible activity.
  • Social prescribing reaches older adults but is hampered by low awareness within the health service, insufficient link-worker capacity (3,300 workers with excessive caseloads), and exclusion of care homes from prevention initiatives.
  • The voluntary and community sector provides significant activity opportunities (running clubs, park runs, faith groups) but lacks national coordination, scale, and integration with health systems; Sport England reports good practice solutions exist but are underfunded.

Why it matters

The UK's ageing population is spending extra years in poor health; embedding physical activity into routine clinical practice and removing systemic barriers could prevent frailty, dementia, disability, and narrow the 20-year healthy-life-expectancy gap between rich and poor areas—but the NHS and social care are not treating it as a priority despite evidence it works.

Tone arc

Opened with Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty's data-driven case for prevention (October 2025), shifted toward systemic critique after evidence from care and disability sectors exposed the 'empathy gap' and perverse benefits incentives (November 2025), concluded with frontline providers emphasizing cross-government coordination gaps and the sport sector's absence from government planning (December 2025).

Themes

prevention-vs-treatmenthealth-inequalitysocial-prescribinginfrastructure-barriersintegration-failure

Key witnesses

Professor Chris Whitty (Chief Medical Officer), Sport England, Active Partnerships National Organisation, National Academy for Social Prescribing, ukactive, Care England, Richmond Group (long-term conditions coalition), Disability charities and social care representatives

Reports & Government Responses

Witness sessions

Themes & actors

Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗

Healthy Ageing: physical activity in an ageing society | Beyond The Vote | Beyond The Vote