Inquiry · Opened 22 July 2025
Skills for transport manufacturing
From: Transport Committee
What this inquiry is asking
Can the UK develop and retain enough skilled workers to meet transport manufacturing's urgent needs across aerospace, automotive, maritime, and rail? The inquiry examines why apprenticeship starts have collapsed 40–42% in a decade, whether government skills programmes actually reach manufacturing, and what systemic barriers prevent workers from moving between sectors despite having transferable skills.
Status / emerging findings
- Aerospace has 9,000–10,000 open vacancies; automotive faces 7% production-level vacancy rate vs 3.4% national average; rail sector needs 2,000 fitters immediately with average worker age 47.
- Manufacturing apprenticeship starts down 42% in under a decade; colleges lack capital equipment funding to train workers in advanced technologies (AI, automation, net zero transition).
- Major employers (Alstom, Hitachi, Siemens, Airbus) systematically underinvest in skills, rely on lean staffing and outsourcing; rail infrastructure workers 90% on zero-hours contracts, blocking skill development.
- Systemic barriers prevent inter-sector worker mobility: GDPR restrictions prevent firms sharing rejected candidates with supply chains; qualification-based rather than competency-based hiring locks out transferable talent.
- Skills England (operational June 2025) has identified 49,000 manufacturing vacancies but lacks directive power; Airbus paying apprenticeship levy in Wales but unable to spend it there creates devolution deadlock.
Why it matters
Without solving skills gaps in the next decade, the UK risks losing manufacturing capacity to competitors precisely when the transition to electric vehicles, hydrogen aviation, and rail electrification offers once-in-a-generation growth.
Tone arc
Opened diagnostic and cooperative; shifted sharply critical after union testimony (November 2025 session) which revealed systematic underinvestment by major employers and fragmentation undermining long-term planning. Government officials acknowledged constraints but lacked concrete remedies.
Themes
Key witnesses
Sarah Maclean CBE (Skills England), Lilian Greenwood MP (Minister for Transport), John McGookin and Eddie Dempsey (National Union of Rail; RMT), Oriel Petry FRAeS (Airbus UK), Matthew Ogg (aerospace sector representative), Tom Chant MBE (maritime sector), Jamie Cater (general manufacturing)
Reports & Government Responses
Special Report · 5 May 2026 · HC 1860
Report · 28 January 2026 · HC 1223
5th Report - Engine for growth: securing skills for transport manufacturing
Witness sessions
Oral evidence · 22 October 2025 · HC 1223
Session 1 of 4Oral evidence · 22 October 2025 · HC 1223
Session 2 of 4Professor Chris Brace; Dr Benjamin Silverstone; Oriel Petry FRAeS
Oral evidence · 5 November 2025 · HC 1223
Session 3 of 4National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers (RMT); John McGookin; Eddie Dempsey
Oral evidence · 5 November 2025 · HC 1223
Session 4 of 4Lilian Greenwood MP; Sarah Maclean CBE; Alan Krikorian; +1 more
Written evidence & correspondence
Themes & actors
Topics across publication summaries
Top organisations & named entities
- Transport Committee·1 reference
- Department for Work and Pensions·1 reference
- Department for Business and Trade·1 reference
- Department for Education·1 reference
- Skills England·1 reference
- Secretary of State for Transport·1 reference
- Careers & Enterprise Company·1 reference
- Make UK·1 reference
- Ruth Cadbury MP·1 reference
- Tom Chant MBE·1 reference
Source · parliament.uk inquiry record ↗