UK-EU customs union (duty to negotiate): Ten Minute Rule Motion
Tied vote: casting vote with the Ayes
100Ayes
100Noes
Defeated · majority 0446 did not vote
646 Members · Aye 100 · No 100 · DNV 446 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
Parliament voted on 9 December 2025 on whether to allow a Liberal Democrat bill to proceed that would legally require the government to negotiate a customs union with the European Union. The vote tied at 100 ayes to 100 noes, triggering the Speaker's casting vote. Speaker Caroline Nokes voted with the ayes, following the long-standing convention that a casting vote should allow further debate rather than block a bill at its earliest stage. The bill passed its first procedural hurdle and is scheduled for a second reading on 16 January 2026. The bill, introduced by Dr Al Pinkerton (Surrey Heath, Liberal Democrat), would place a statutory duty on the Secretary of State to enter into negotiations with the EU to agree a customs union. A customs union would eliminate tariffs on goods traded between the UK and EU and align the UK to a common external tariff, reducing the trade barriers that have existed since the UK left the EU's single market and customs union. The bill does not compel a particular outcome, only the opening of negotiations. Its practical effect, if it became law, would be to constrain government discretion on post-Brexit trade policy. The vote divided sharply along Brexit lines rather than purely party lines. All 89 voting Conservatives opposed the bill, as did all six voting Reform UK members and one independent. The Liberal Democrats delivered 67 of the 100 aye votes and were the bill's driving force. The Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, the Greens, and the Social Democratic and Labour Party voted entirely in favour. Labour's position was the most striking feature: 346 Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs had no vote recorded, while 12 Labour MPs voted aye and 3 voted no.
Voting Aye meant
Support compelling the government to negotiate a customs union with the EU, viewing Brexit's trade barriers as damaging to the economy
Voting No meant
Oppose reopening customs union negotiations with the EU, defending the UK's post-Brexit trade independence
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
12
3
346
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
89
27
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
66
0
5
Labour and Co-operative Party
—
1
0
41
Independent
—
5
1
7
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
8
0
1
Reform UK
Whipped No
0
6
2
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
0
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
2
0
0
Your Party
—
0
0
2
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
1
0
0
Restore Britain
—
0
1
0
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Supports the Bill as a necessary step to remedy Brexit's economic damage and restore UK competitiveness through a bespoke customs union with the EU.Liberal Democrats · Voted aye · Read full speech (1,823 words) →
Opposes the Bill on grounds that it undermines government efforts, creates business uncertainty, threatens existing trade deals, and the EU has no appetite for it.Conservative Party · Voted no · Read full speech (1,598 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0