Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill Report Stage: New Clause 14
98Ayes
402Noes
Defeated · majority 304 · Government won147 did not vote
647 Members · Aye 98 · No 402 · DNV 147 · grey dots in centre are abstentions
Analysis
Commons
Commons
On 12 May 2025, the House of Commons voted on New Clause 14, a proposed amendment to the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill at Report Stage (the stage where the full House scrutinises and can alter a bill before its final vote). The amendment, which took a pro-asylum-seeker-rights approach, was defeated by 402 votes to 98. The government's position was to oppose the clause, and it prevailed comfortably. New Clause 14 sought to shift the government's approach toward a more humanitarian immigration policy framework. Its defeat means the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill continues on its original trajectory, maintaining the government's preferred enforcement-focused provisions without the modifications the amendment would have introduced. The outcome affects people seeking asylum in the UK, shaping the legal framework governing how their claims and presence are handled. The Conservative Party provided the bulk of the Aye votes with 85, joined by 8 Reform UK MPs, 2 Liberal Democrats, 2 Democratic Unionists, and 1 Independent, forming an unusual cross-bench grouping. Labour and the Labour and Co-operative Party voted unanimously against, totalling 320 No votes, with the SNP, Greens, Plaid Cymru, and most Liberal Democrats also voting No. The result reflects a striking division in which a Conservative-led amendment on asylum seeker rights was defeated by the Labour government with support from smaller progressive parties, illustrating the complex realignment around immigration policy in this Parliament.
Voting Aye meant
Support repealing or restricting the Human Rights Act to make it easier to deport people, arguing it is misused to block removals
Voting No meant
Oppose removing Human Rights Act protections, arguing it is a fundamental safeguard and that the Government's own reforms to Article 8 are a more proportionate approach
Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.
Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
288
73
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
85
0
31
Liberal Democrats
Whipped No
2
61
9
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
32
10
Independent
—
1
5
7
Scottish National Party
Whipped No
0
7
2
Reform UK
Whipped Aye
8
0
0
Sinn Féin
—
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
—
2
0
3
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped No
0
4
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped No
0
3
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
—
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
—
0
0
1
Restore Britain
—
0
0
1
Speaker
—
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
—
1
0
0
Ulster Unionist Party
—
1
0
0
Your Party
—
0
1
0
Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed
Government must balance security with humanity; repealing failed Conservative legislation while introducing robust immigration controls; strengthening enforcement against people-smuggling gangs; each asylum case must be judged on meritsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (5,291 words) →
Asylum seekers are victims of conflict and human rights abuse; the world must address root causes of displacement rather than treating migrants as threatsIndependent · Voted no · Read full speech (139 words) →
All illegal migrants should be immediately detained and deported; treats asylum seekers as security threatsReform · Voted aye · Read full speech (94 words) →
Asylum seekers should be allowed to work after 3 months rather than 12 to enable integration and reduce public costsLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (205 words) →
Border security cooperation between UK, Ireland and Northern Ireland authorities must be strengthened to prevent illegal immigration via the Irish borderDUP · Voted aye · Read full speech (263 words) →
Previous Government's delays to asylum processing created huge backlogs; current Government must untangle this inherited chaosLabour · Voted no · Read full speech (98 words) →
System is being gamed for economic migration; tough enforcement is necessary to prevent abuse of asylum claimsConservative · Voted aye · Read full speech (99 words) →
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0