A divisionDivision No. 43 · Wednesday, 13 November 2024· Commons· Trade and Brexit

Draft Windsor Framework (Non-Commercial Movement of Pet Animals) Regulations 2024

412Ayes
16Noes
Carried · majority 396 · Government won
222 did not vote
Aye412No16DID NOT VOTE · 222

650 Members · Aye 412 · No 16 · DNV 222 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

Parliament voted on 13 November 2024 to approve the Draft Windsor Framework (Non-Commercial Movement of Pet Animals) Regulations 2024, passing by 412 votes to 16. The regulations set out the rules governing how pet owners can move animals between Northern Ireland and the European Union under the Windsor Framework, the post-Brexit agreement that replaced the original Northern Ireland Protocol. The vote was largely procedural in nature, with overwhelming cross-party support and very little organised opposition. The regulations matter in practical terms for pet owners in Northern Ireland, who face a distinct set of rules compared to those in Great Britain because of Northern Ireland's unique position within both the UK internal market and the EU's single market for goods. Under the Windsor Framework, Northern Ireland continues to follow certain EU standards, and these regulations bring domestic law into alignment with the relevant EU requirements for the non-commercial movement of pets, covering things such as microchipping, vaccinations, and travel documentation. Without such regulations, pet owners travelling between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland or other EU member states would face legal uncertainty. The political divide on this vote was narrow but revealing. Labour, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens, and the Labour and Co-operative Party voted almost unanimously in favour. The Democratic Unionist Party, which has historically opposed the Windsor Framework on the grounds that it creates regulatory differences between Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom, provided four of the sixteen no votes. Reform UK contributed two further no votes, consistent with that party's scepticism of post-Brexit arrangements that maintain alignment with EU rules. Only four Conservatives voted in favour, though the vast majority of the parliamentary party was absent rather than voting against, and three Conservatives did vote no. The scale of Conservative absence reflects the party's ongoing internal divisions over Brexit-related arrangements rather than outright opposition.

Voting Aye meant
Support implementing the Windsor Framework pet travel scheme, accepting that a formal pet passport system is a reasonable and improved arrangement for moving animals between Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Voting No meant
Oppose the Northern Ireland pet travel scheme, arguing it imposes new restrictions on movement within the United Kingdom that undermine the constitutional integrity of the UK and go beyond the previous grace period arrangements
§ 01Who voted how.428 voting Members · 222 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped Aye
303
1
57
Conservative and Unionist Party
Whipped Aye
4
3
109
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
57
0
15
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped Aye
36
0
6
Independent
3
2
9
Scottish National Party
Whipped Aye
5
1
3
Reform UK
0
2
5
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
Whipped No
0
4
1
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Plaid Cymru
0
0
4
Social Democratic and Labour Party
1
0
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
0
0
1
Restore Britain
0
1
0
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
1
0
Ulster Unionist Party
0
1
0
Your Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0