A divisionDivision No. 11 · Wednesday, 4 September 2024· Commons· Economy

Budget Responsibility Bill: Committee: Amendment 2

73Ayes
375Noes
Defeated · majority 302 · Government won
210 did not vote
Aye75No364DID NOT VOTE · 210

658 Members · Aye 73 · No 375 · DNV 210 · grey dots in centre are abstentions

Analysis
Commons

MPs voted on 4 September 2024 on Amendment 2 to the Budget Responsibility Bill at committee stage. The amendment would have allowed the Office for Budget Responsibility to notify the Independent Adviser on Ministers' Interests if it believed a government failure to commission an OBR report before a major fiscal announcement might amount to a breach of the Ministerial Code. The amendment was defeated by 375 votes to 73. The Bill itself was designed to prevent a repeat of the 2022 mini-Budget, when the government of the day announced large fiscal commitments without commissioning an OBR forecast first. Its core requirement is that HM Treasury must obtain independent OBR scrutiny before a minister announces a fiscally significant measure. Amendment 2 would have gone a step further, giving the OBR a route to flag potential ministerial conduct issues to the Independent Adviser, adding a layer of accountability beyond the Bill's existing provisions. The Liberal Democrats provided virtually all of the 73 votes in favour, joined by the four Green MPs, three Plaid Cymru MPs, and one Alliance MP. All Labour and Labour and Co-operative MPs who voted opposed the amendment, producing the 375 majority against. The SNP had no votes recorded. The government argued the Bill's existing provisions were sufficient and that the amendment was unnecessary; the Liberal Democrats contended it was a useful safeguard to ensure ministers could not sidestep independent fiscal scrutiny without consequence.

Voting Aye meant
Support empowering the OBR to flag potential Ministerial Code breaches to the Independent Adviser, adding an accountability mechanism for ministers who bypass independent fiscal scrutiny.
Voting No meant
Oppose the amendment as unnecessary, preferring the Bill's existing provisions requiring OBR scrutiny without extending its remit into ministerial conduct.
§ 01Who voted how.448 voting Members · 210 absent

Each row is one party. The stacked bar gives the within-party split of Aye / No / Absent; the columns on the right give the raw counts. The whip column shows the published party position — “Free vote” means the whip was formally removed for this division.

Party
Whip
Aye / No / Abs
Aye
No
Abs
Labour Party
Whipped No
0
322
39
Conservative and Unionist Party
0
0
116
Liberal Democrats
Whipped Aye
65
0
6
Labour and Co-operative Party
Whipped No
0
37
5
Independent
2
3
9
Scottish National Party
0
0
9
Reform UK
0
0
7
Sinn Féin
0
0
7
Democratic Unionist Party
0
0
5
Green Party of England and Wales
Whipped Aye
4
0
0
Plaid Cymru
Whipped Aye
3
0
1
Social Democratic and Labour Party
0
1
1
Your Party
0
1
1
Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
1
0
0
Restore Britain
0
0
1
Speaker
0
0
1
Traditional Unionist Voice
0
0
1
Ulster Unionist Party
0
0
1

Source · Hansard · UK Parliament Votes API · whip status from announced positions; “free vote” indicates the whip was formally removed

§ 02From the debate.7 principal speakers
Nigel HuddlestonOpposedDroitwich and Evesham
Amendment 9 should require OBR reports on changes to fiscal rules themselves, not just measures below thresholds; accuses Labour of planning to change debt definition to hide borrowing.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (2,673 words)
Dr Jeevun SandherSupportiveLoughborough
Maiden speech supporting fiscal responsibility and green investment to build prosperity; welcomes Bill as enabling growth rather than constraining it.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (1,229 words)
Andrew GriffithOpposedArundel and South Downs
Bill is disreputable political theatre that surrenders Parliament's responsibilities to unelected OBR; definition of 'fiscally significant' is dangerously vague and catches too many legitimate decisions.Conservative · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,598 words)
Stella CreasySupportiveWalthamstow
Supports Bill and amendments 6-7 to capture cumulative fiscal impacts, especially PFI debt which represents catastrophic value-for-money failure requiring independent scrutiny.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,804 words)
Sarah OlneySupportiveRichmond Park
Amendments 1-4 strengthen Bill by broadening 'fiscally significant' to include interest rate/growth impacts and requiring consultation on Charter changes; Bill essential safeguard after mini-Budget.Liberal Democrat · Voted aye · Read full speech (654 words)
Dave DooganOpposedAngus and Perthshire Glens
Bill is toothless: OBR cannot stop budgets, only comment on them; does nothing to prevent austerity; Labour's £22bn black hole claim is exaggerated to justify attacks on pensioners.SNP · Voted no_vote_recorded · Read full speech (1,589 words)
Amanda MartinSupportivePortsmouth North
Maiden speech emphasizing fiscal responsibility as foundation for opportunity; Bill enables real change after Tory chaos that left constituents unable to afford mortgages and rent.Labour · Voted no · Read full speech (2,156 words)
§ 03Related divisions.Same topic · recent
Sources
Division dataUK Parliament Votes API
DebateHansard · Commons
Stance analysisAI analysis · Claude 4.x
LicenceOpen Parliament Licence v3.0